Search for: "Doe 103"
Results 141 - 160
of 3,229
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am
Under German insolvency law, the debtor does not lose its legal capacity even if it loses the power to administer and dispose of the insolvency estate (see Schulte, Patentgesetz mit EPÜ, 10th edition, Introduction, paragraph 217).3.3 For the reasons stated above, the board had no reason to interrupt t [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 2:20 pm
(Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 81-103, December 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:40 am
Eric Segall (Georgia State University - College of Law) has posed Lost in Space: Laurence Tribe's Invisible Constitution (Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol. 103, p. 434, 2009) on SSRN. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 4:10 am
To protect owners of property who allow others to use their property for such activities, New York State General Obligations Law section 9-103 limits the liability of such property owners for certain activities. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:55 pm
The 3-hour rule does not apply if you are asleep, unconscious or otherwise incapacitated or if an exigent circumstance prevents the officers from complying. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm
But does that mean the Rosen requirement is the problem? [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:50 am
What does this mean? [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:10 am
Nowhere in §282 does it say that patents are presumed valid unless patent eligibility is challenged. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 1:06 pm
MPEP § 2144 discusses supporting a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 by reliance on scientific theory and legal precedent. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 1:46 pm
Juarbe-Jimenez, 443 F.3d 103, 110(1st Cir.2006) (interrogatory answers based on personal knowledge suffice for summary judgment). [read post]
12 May 2014, 10:46 am
Under Section 7-103(a)(4) of the Family Law Article, a Maryland court can grant an absolute divorce to couples who were separated for 12 months if they lived separate and apart, not cohabiting for 12 months without interruption before they apply for divorce. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
News has reached us of an interesting case in Bow County Court involving the right to succeed to a secure tenancy and the operation of s.103 of the Housing Act 1985: London Borough of Waltham Forest v Mahmood. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:33 am
A combination of familiar elements according to known methods is likely to be obvious when it does no more than yield predictable results. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 2:01 am
However, this does not imply a right to an explicit ruling on each and every submission. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 4:08 am
The Decision Finding - after much analysis that the two laws directly CONFLICT - decision came down to this - the "general" parole revocation law - section 17-2- 103(11)(b)(IV) does not apply to Colorado Sex Offender Parole (the parole board to revoke his parole for a maximum of 180 days), while the more "specific" law 17-22.5-403(8)(b) does. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:57 am
As noted above, this PTA decision does not surprise me. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:26 am
And, impressively, he does so with his eyes open….The New York Times profile — written by A.G. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Even Microsoft/Adobe/HP, which does not support Alice on these claims urged the Supreme Court to find software patent eligible. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 8:49 pm
Moreover, where, as here,“the references and the invention are easily understandable,”the Board does not err by relying on its “commonsense” to make such a determination. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:17 pm
Anticipation does not allowfor such picking-and-choosing.SeeNet MoneyIN, Inc. v. [read post]
