Search for: "Doe v. Regents of the University of California" Results 141 - 160 of 286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 405 (“Laurel Heights I”)); and (2) “make[ ] a reasonable effort to substantively connect a project’s air quality impacts to likely health consequences. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
Regents of the University of California, the Supreme Court held that the Trump administration had failed to engage in “reasoned decisionmaking” under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) when the administration sought to end President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2010); Regents of University of California v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:32 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:38 pm by Christa Culver
§ 1623; (2) whether a court must undertake conflict preemption analysis after concluding that an express preemption provision does not apply in a case involving both types of preemption claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (California Supreme Court)Petition for certiorariBrief of the Regents of the University of California et al. in oppositionBrief of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges et al. in… [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 5:40 am by SHG
And the law was established in a decision, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
For the “overall” category—a composite of the five other ratings— a first reader can and does consider the applicant’s race. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
For the “overall” category—a composite of the five other ratings— a first reader can and does consider the applicant’s race. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:55 pm
Regents of University of California, 793 P.2d 479, 51 Cal.3d 120 (1990). [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:13 am by Moseley Collins
In Marron the Court of Appeal expressly held that the enhanced damages pursuant to 15657 are NOT punitive in nature for which the Real Party in Interest, Regents of the University of California, would have had immunity. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:10 am by Moseley Collins
In Marron the Court of Appeal expressly held that the enhanced damages pursuant to 15657 are not punitive in nature for which the Real Party in Interest, Regents of the University of California, would have had immunity. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
One of the leaders of that effort was Ward Connerly, a former college regent in California who had spearheaded the successful “Proposition 209″ campaign in his home state   He was joined in Michigan by Jennifer Gratz, a young white woman who had been the lead figure in another 2003 Supreme Court decision, Gratz v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
At another level, such lawsuits (which are usually class actions) almost never articulate any credible basis that the plaintiffs suffered any actual harm.In Regents of the University of California v. [read post]