Search for: "Does 2 through 89"
Results 141 - 160
of 957
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2020, 1:51 pm
I’m not sure why ground 8 is just moved from part 1 of Schedule 2 HA 1988 to part 2, rather than being made of no effect for the relevant period. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 9:56 am
Laseur, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 504, 2003 SCC 54 (CanLII): There is no authoritative definition of chronic pain. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 8:00 am
Lord JusticeArnold stated that the Court should not depart from the CJEU's jurisprudence in the present case for eight reasons, in paras [77]-[89], summarised (and paraphrased!) [read post]
5 May 2015, 5:58 am
[The argument here is that the Regulation has Art 118 as its legal basis, but that relates to "measures for the creation of European intellectual property rights to provide uniform protection of intellectual property rights throughout the Union"; since the Unitary Patent Regulation does not create a Eruopean property right and it is not uniform throughout the EU, the legal basis is invalid]Misuse of power through the use of enhanced cooperation for purposes other than… [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 2:17 am
In addition, it does not say what it means by “in and of itself”, does it mean prima facie? [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:52 pm
Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
The Secretary of State, through the Treasury Solicitor, considers that this issue has been answered in Pinnock and Powell. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
The Secretary of State, through the Treasury Solicitor, considers that this issue has been answered in Pinnock and Powell. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
But Fleming does not grapple with the enormous volume of scholarship examining the original meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 8:24 pm
Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89 ('87); Bradley v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am
Sec. 2. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am
Sec. 2. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 1:18 am
This calculation does not take into account loss of time to review paper evidence versus faster electronic review tools. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 8:07 am
But what does that mean? [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
Although Gevo does not appear to concede the issue, Gevo does not argue that Butamax's use of the L. grayi enzyme literally infringes independent claim 1 of the '375 patent. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:10 pm
Towles, C Three-Star Prospects: 2. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:38 am
Holding: The Carmack Amendment does not apply to a shipment that originated overseas under a single through bill of lading. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 8:43 am
State, 13 S.W.3d 89, 92 (Tex. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
Wey, 89 N.Y.S.3d 11, 14 (N.Y. [read post]
