Search for: "E. D. v. USA" Results 141 - 160 of 844
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Parker Drilling Co., 337 F.3d 558, 563 (5th Cir. 2003) (“the regulations govern the parties’ joint and several liabilities vis-à-vis the Government not amongst themselves”) and Total E&P USA, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:49 am
The Defamation Bill 2006 should have provided an opportunity to consider this issue - but that Bill would not have changed the law in this area had it been enacted.On the libel tourism point, possibly the best Irish example is USA Rugby Football Union Limited v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:49 am
The Defamation Bill 2006 should have provided an opportunity to consider this issue - but that Bill would not have changed the law in this area had it been enacted.On the libel tourism point, possibly the best Irish example is USA Rugby Football Union Limited v. [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 11:50 am
Immediately thereafter, David's company, Hologram USA, Inc., and others filed suit for patent infringement against Pulse in the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason, Damon Root writes that although “[e]arlier this month, 207 members of Congress … filed a friend of the court brief [in June Medical Services v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 5:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Int’l Trade Comm’n, 530 F.2d940 (C.C.P.A. 1976).6 In Import Motors, the court explainedthat “[s]trictly interpreted,” the phrase “‘finaldetermination of the Commission under subsection (d) or(e)’ [in § 1337(c)7] . . . refers to a final administrativedecision on the merits, excluding or refusing to excludearticles from entry under subsection (d) or (e). [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:16 am by John L. Welch
., Serial No. 77412149 [Section 2(d) refusal to register HeartWorks for “apparatus for measuring blood pressure, body fat, weight and pulse, namely, body and health monitoring machine for standard measurements, namely, weight, body mass index, body fat content, heart rate and blood pressure, to be operated by an individual in public indoor locations” and “wheelchairs; convertible wheel chairs” in view of the registered mark HEARTWORKS for "Medical equipment,… [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 7:19 pm by Ronald Mann
This morning brought the first opinion from Justice Neil Gorsuch, explaining the decision of a unanimous court in Henson v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 3:19 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Microsoft v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:23 am by Nietzer
-amerikanischer Urteile muss mangels eines völkerrechtlichen Übereinkommens auf die §§ 328, 723 ZPO zurückgegriffen werden. [read post]
3 May 2011, 8:04 am by Sylvain Métille
décision rédigée sur 58 pages et suivant un schéma classique. [read post]