Search for: "Eastman v. Eastman" Results 141 - 160 of 380
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Laura Phillips Sawyer
Letters between company executives, detectives, and "cut-rate" retailers detailed the exchanges leading to Old Dearborn Distributors v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:21 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Eastman Kodak Co.,789 F.2d 1556, 1559 (Fed. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:34 am by John Eastman
John Eastman is the Henry Salvatori Professor of Law & Community Service at Chapman University’s Fowler School of Law. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
His greatest victory, including the 1917 decision by Judge Learned Hand in The Masses Publishing Co. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 10:30 am by NCC Staff
On Feb. 26, 2018, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals said in a 10-3 decision in Zarda v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants’ alleged assurance that her case would not go to trial is at odds with the clear language of the first retainer and, at most, represents a promise about the future (see Eastman Kodak Co. v Roopak Enters., 202 AD2d 220, 222 [1st Dept 1994]) — which in any event [*2]was kept. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 7:27 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The decision provides some much-needed guidance on how to apply the Supreme Court's Iqbal test, which governs motions to dismiss under Rule 12.The case is Irrea v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 8:23 pm by Aurora Barnes
Pactiv Corp. 16-1148 Issues: (1) Whether Eastman Kodak Industry Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 2:58 pm by Jeffrey May
On April 21, a group of antitrust professors filed an amicus brief, supporting the petitioner and asking the Court to address whether the Rule 56 standard of Eastman Kodak Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:20 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Third, the court of appeals noted (id. at 8a) that, in Eastman Kodak Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 8:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Eastman Kodak Co., 657 F.3d 1349, 1356–57 (Fed.Cir. 2011) (quoting Fairchild Republic Co. v. [read post]