Search for: "English v. Jones" Results 141 - 160 of 393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2017, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Smith v Jones seems to tell us that unless there is a precisely clear plan of attack, criminal lawyers can ignore risks of violence. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 12:39 am
When Jones requested the return of his French newspaper, Webster made a copy for himself and had it certified by James Kent on 22 May. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
The English text of the Treaty cedes sovereignty to the Queen of England; guarantees Māori “the full exclusive and undisturbed possession of their Lands and Estates Forests Fisheries and other properties which they may collectively or individually possess,” with the Crown having the exclusive right of preemption with respect to land purchases; and provides Māori with “all the Rights and Privileges of British Subjects. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:01 am
Anne Marie Brennan, Historical Reflections on the Criminalisation of Terrorism under International Law from the League of Nations to R v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Four people described as “sports stars” have become the latest celebrities to be named in American publications despite having injunctions in English courts. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:32 am by Barry Sookman
Comments Canadian common law courts are still struggling to develop the contours of the emerging tort of intrusion upon seclusion first recognized in Ontario in the Jones v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 6:06 pm by Justin A
Jones, "Grauntes," but for Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Antigua & Barbuda The country’s Defamation Act of 2015 is being positioned to serve as a model for the rest of the English-speaking Caribbean. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 2:38 am by INFORRM
(ii) Abuse of process As established in the case of Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75, the Court is required to stop defamation proceedings which serve no legitimate purpose, i.e. whether a ‘real and substantial tort’ had been committed. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
This country’s landmark contribution to the international jurisprudence, almost a generation ago now, in Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick, was dismissed by a technologically savvy English judge in 2005 as having treated communications via the internet as if they were “seaside postcards sent by conventional means”. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm by Molly Runkle
This afternoon the Court granted review in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]