Search for: "Ex Parte Rodriguez" Results 141 - 160 of 174
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
 (Gray On Claims) Precedential BPAI opinion rejects functional claim elements as indefinite and not enabled: Ex parte Rodriguez (Patently-O) BPAI issues opinions on four NTP patent re-examinations (12:01 Tuesday) ITC decides not to review ALJ’s grant of Rambus’ summary determination motion that its licensing activities satisfy the domestic industry requirement in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) (ITC Law Blog) ITC issues final determination of no… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Gray On Claims) Precedential BPAI opinion rejects functional claim elements as indefinite and not enabled: Ex parte Rodriguez (Patently-O) BPAI issues opinions on four NTP patent re-examinations (12:01 Tuesday) ITC decides not to review ALJ's grant of Rambus' summary determination motion that its licensing activities satisfy the domestic industry requirement in certain semiconductor chips (337-TA-661) (ITC Law Blog) ITC issues final determination of no violation… [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 11:29 am
Ex parte Rodriguez, 08-0693 (BPAI 2009) (Precedential) fd080693.pdf In its first precedential decision since February 2009, an expanded BPAI panel has applied the Federal Circuit's 2008 Aristocrat decision in rejecting applicant's means-plus-function (MPF) claims as indefinite for failing to provide any corresponding structures in the specification other than a general purpose computer. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 11:29 am by Dennis Crouch
Ex parte Rodriguez, 08-0693 (BPAI 2009) (Precedential) fd080693.pdf In its first precedential decision since February 2009, an expanded BPAI panel has applied the Federal Circuit's 2008 Aristocrat decision in rejecting applicant's means-plus-function (MPF) claims as indefinite for failing to provide any corresponding structures in the specification other than a general purpose computer. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch) Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat) India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force - ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for Protecting Cinematographical Creations (1993) &… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch)   Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat)   India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force – ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP)   Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for Protecting… [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:21 am
(IP Watch)   Germany BGH rules on liability for links and adwords (IPKat)   India Information Technology (Amendment) Act 2008 now in force – ISP liability (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP)   Israel Round table on software patents at the Israel Patent Office (The IP Factor) Invitation to submit briefs to IPO re software patent policy in Israel (The IP Factor) Central District Court rules that film download site be taken down and fines owner/operator: Organization for… [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:35 am by R.J. MacReady
Additionally, the Court denied habeas relief in Ex parte Michael Wayne Norris, albeit in an unpublished, per curiam opinion. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 8:58 pm by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
Ex Parte Rodriguez, Appeal 2008-000693, October 1, 2009 (Precedential Opinion) The application was directed to a computer-based system and method for configuring and verifying a "structurally variable and complex system. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:59 am
View the article here01/31/2009By SCOTT JASONJesse Rodriguez can be labeled many ways: father, boyfriend, two-strike felon, ex-con, homeless, a 43-year-old. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Rodriguez, No. 06-20774 Convictions and sentences concerning participation in a single, broad conspiracy to transport many aliens to Houston are affirmed where: 1.) two appellants depended on the aliens' transportation to Houston for their full payment, though they did not intend to take any aliens to Houston themselves; and 2.) third appellant knew that many aliens would be transported by trailer well past Robstown. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:38 pm
Por otra parte, el resultado del análisis precedente nos conducirá de forma inexorable a la comprobación de la responsabilidad civil de los prestadores de servicios de la información, desde una perspectiva subjetiva o formal (determinación de la autoría) y objetiva o material (alcance de la responsabilidad). [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rodriguez, No. 06-2656 Sentencing courts have discretion to consider items such as fast-track disparity in considering requests for variant sentences premised on disagreements with the manner in which the sentencing guidelines operate, however, they are not obligated to deviate from the guidelines based on those items. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 12:28 am
"Rodriguez ratcheted everything up. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Rodriguez-Amaya, No. 06-4514 Conviction for unlawful reentry after deportation by an aggravated felon is affirmed where the time defendant was detained by United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement on administrative charges pending his removal was not detention "in connection with" his arrest, thus defendant's indictment did not violate the Speedy Trial Act. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Rodriguez, No. 07-10535 Defendant's sentence for illegal reentry following removal is affirmed over claims that: 1) the district court committed Fanfan error by sentencing him within a framework that limited its ability to vary from the Guidelines; 2) the district court erred in treating a prior drug conviction as a drug-trafficking offense under U.S.S.G. section 2L1.2; 3) the sentence was unreasonable; and 4) the sentence violated his equal protection rights because he did not have… [read post]