Search for: "Federal Express Corporation v. Focus Corporation"
Results 141 - 160
of 560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
Along those lines, much of the 2018 SEC Guidance tracks the 2011 SEC CF Guidance, retaining a focus on “material” cyber risks and incidents and expanding upon its predecessor while also reinforcing the SEC’s expectations about cyber-disclosure. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
See Stolt-Nielsen SA v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 10:32 am
Here, the Court rejected the Owner’s singular focus on the “express” dedication label that was used in Plaintiff’s Complaint. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
City of Los Angeles, in which the Court is considering whether the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act contains an unexpressed “market participant” exception permitting a municipal government to take action that would otherwise conflict with the Act’s express preemption clause, at least under specified circumstances. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 3:04 pm
Introduction In Epic Games v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 11:07 am
By letter dated July 13, 2009, several dozen national associations and large corporate entities (ranging from the American Hospital Association to Exxon Mobile Corporation), wrote to Attorney General Eric Holder to express their concerns that the redelegation of issuance authority may lead to problems with: “consistency, coordination, institutional memory, and a variety of other issues that overbroad delegation would raise. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:54 pm
In its June 21, 2021 decision in Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 8:51 pm
Cole, 2012 SCC 53 at para 45, quoting R. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:58 pm
As Thomas Young has recently explained on his Copyright Culture blog, "[c]opyright law doctrines, such as scènes à faire, appear well suited to the task by delineating which expressions are copyrightable at the time of creation" but Google's proposed "focus on ex-post considerations, such as user familiarity, [would] undermine copyright's basic principles and threaten to penalize a copyright holder for creating a successful work that has… [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
Dagenhart and United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Option 3: Withdraw Religious Protection from Businesses In light of the foregoing, the focus on the corporate form appears to be misguided. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
Corporate Commission of Oklahoma: the statute, before the amendment, was entirely valid. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 5:51 am
In the end, he determined that the Rights Plan was subject to the enhanced scrutiny test under Unocal Corporation v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 5:45 pm
Concepcion and American Express Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 3:51 am
Specifically, he expressed concern that the jurors would be so distracted by outside events that they would be unable to focus on the trial, thereby compromising petitioner's right to a verdict based upon the evidence. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 11:38 am
Cooper Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:06 pm
Should the Supreme Court side with the United States, we can expect the focus to shift to Congress for a legislative solution. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 8:53 am
Everything in the universe can be expressed in probabilities. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
Ltd v Cadbury (Nig) Plc (2006) 6 NWLR (Pt. 976)338; International Finance Corporation v DSNL Offshore Ltd (2007) LPELR-5140(CA) 12-3 (Rhodes Vivour JCA (as he then was); Union Bank of Nig. [read post]
