Search for: "Fictitious Defendants No. 1 to 11"
Results 141 - 158
of 158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Below, we discuss the most significant aspects of Elena Kagan’s experience and writings as they relate to the Supreme Court. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:42 am
The 2008 affidavit by the TLC's former licensing director offered by defendant in support of his motion fails to demonstrate conclusively that plaintiff has no cause of action (see Lawrence v Graubard Miller, 11 NY3d 588, 595 [2008]). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:39 am
Code § 1028A(a)(1). [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:51 am
The exception was bankruptcy: Forty-two firms with assets of $1 billion or more filed for Chapter 11 protection in 2009. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
Sunita Sharma 11. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
Below we look at some of the themes and trends that emerge from the numbers. 1. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 12:19 pm
He also apparently used about $3.6 million finance his lifestyle, including a $1 million home in Fairview. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 11:01 pm
Doe 1, 170 P.3d 712 (Ariz. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:25 pm
Count 11: Dr. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:25 pm
Count 11: Dr. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 1:03 pm
Somehow, because these defendants hate America so much that they 1) didn’t go to law school; and 2) talked to the cops without a lawyer, the First figures that even though they were ordered out of the hotel room and into the hall, their interrogation wasn’t custodial. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 7:06 pm
Quarterman, No. 06-70048 Denial of a habeas corpus petition in a capital murder case is affirmed where: 1) several ineffective assistance of counsel claims failed for lack of evidence of either deficient counsel or of prejudice to defendant; 2) a Brady claim failed because the evidence alleged to have been withheld consisted of defendant's own statements; and 3) the government's use of inconsistent theories in the separate trials of co-defendants did not… [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Heath, No. 07-1215 A conviction for tax evasion is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) the failure of the district court to properly state a jury charge by omitting that the government had to prove that a "substantial" amount of tax was due; 2) an instruction to the jury that they did not have to find defendant's conduct "willful;" 3) the phrase "Void where prohibited by law" and a jury instruction on whether a document with such a mark… [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 6:05 am
[1] U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 12:25 pm
But in a post 9-11 world, you take these threats seriously. [read post]
7 May 2007, 2:19 pm
Section 15(11) of Bill 152 repeals Section 155 and replaces it with the following: 155. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 8:42 am
If you are unable to unanimously agree that at least one of the statements or representations alleged in Count 1 was false, then you must find the defendant not guilty of Count 1. [read post]
