Search for: "G. S. VERSUS T. S." Results 141 - 160 of 528
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2020, 7:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Indy Connection didn’t engage in active marketing of the shirts; didn’t intend to market to Cornette’s fans but to fans of deathmatch wrestling; and “actively did not want Cornette’s fans to purchase the Shirts. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 7:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Se encontraron en la disyuntiva de tener que escoger entre favorecer los intereses de su cliente a obtener el acuerdo más beneficioso y expedito posible versus preferir su conveniencia económica al colocarse sus honorarios sobre la mesa de negociación como pieza clave para la culminación de la disputa. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Chase, 2020 ONSC 5083 (CanLII) [28] I note that in this case (and in all others currently before the Court) the Mother and Father have delegated the authority to make the decision respecting their child’s in-person versus online attendance at school to me, a judge who has never met the parents and who will likely never meet the child. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 2:53 pm by Eugene Volokh
The State argues that "the increased risk of violence when threats or intimidation [are] done by a gang member, versus a non-gang member … is the nexus the Court of Appeals referenced when it concluded [§] 13-1202(B)(2) does not penalize mere membership in a street gang. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
  I'm genuinely agnostic as to the merits of at-large versus district voting. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:19 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
But we are happy to see decisions of interest to this blog’s readers issuing once again, including a brand new opinion from Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jennifer G. [read post]
4 May 2020, 9:00 am by Paula Lombardi
[2]Lévis (City) v Tétreault; Lévis (City) v 2629-4470 Québec inc. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:52 am by Roel van Woudenberg
T 727/00, Reasons, point 1.1.4).1.6.3 The board notes, however, that most decisions following this well-established approach relate to amendments based on lists of non-con [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 11:09 pm by Bill Marler
He diagnosed Carolyn with inflammatory versus infectious colitis, but he did not think this looked like mesenteric ischemia. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 12:13 pm by Keith Mallinson
  Were concerns about introduction of yet another new G—including the need to invest in a network overlay, more spectrum, replace devices and pay additional patent license fees—well founded or needless? [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:25 am by MBettman
At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Sarah Hutnick, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Montgomery County, for Appellant State of Ohio Marshall G. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Michael H Cohen
You haven’t done anything wrong in anyone’s eyes, well, except in the eyes of the law, it’s strict liability. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 6:53 am by Schachtman
… [I]t is time to stop using the term “statistically significant” entirely’. [read post]