Search for: "GIVENS v. JONES et al."
Results 141 - 160
of 168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
See also Manual at 614 n. 198., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:55 am
Jones v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:29 pm
(See, e.g., Acharya et al.). [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:21 pm
(See, e.g., Acharya et al.). [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm
This new cohort of market participants in the U.S. equities market may not be considered equally as sophisticated as institutional investors with fiduciary duties to their clients.[16] According to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Staff Report on Equity and Options Market Structure Conditions in Early 2021, “[c]onsideration should be given to whether game-like features and celebratory animations that are likely intended to create positive… [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Given that the abuser’s lawyer may not be aware of the extent of the violence, should the victim’s lawyer warn opposing counsel about coercive controlling behaviours so they can try to manage the case safely? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm
As the Supreme Court put it in a 1984 decision (Bob Jones University v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
Given the prevalence of plaintiffs’ counsel’s confusing the 95% confidence coefficient with a burden of proof akin to beyond a reasonable doubt, great care in this area is, indeed, required. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
Given the prevalence of plaintiffs’ counsel’s confusing the 95% confidence coefficient with a burden of proof akin to beyond a reasonable doubt, great care in this area is, indeed, required. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
It consists of 12 further members, including Jennifer Bezaire, Chatelle Cseh, Darcy Romaine, Jacob Demstra, Jeremy Opolsky, John Adair, Rebecca Jones, Sunil Mathal, Suzanne Chiodo, Tamara D. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm
Not surprisingly, given the absence of any non-litigation experts endorsing the causal conclusion, the defendants challenged plaintiffs’ proffered expert witnesses under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Given the enormous attention that is paid to sexual offenders, both in the U.S. and internationally, there is a specific need for more accurate information to be disseminated to the public. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Pix Credit: Michael A. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
V Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
See Nobelman v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Accordingly, Cheng would rewrite the legal system’s approach to important legal disputes, such as disputes over causal claims, from: Whether a given substance causes a given disease to Whether the expert community believes that a given substance causes a given disease. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am
Olah, “My Search for Carbocations and Their Role in Chemistry,” Nobel Lecture (Dec. 8, 1994), quoting George von Békésy, Experiments in Hearing 8 (N.Y. 1960); see also McMillan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
Another serious blawger, Nearly Legal, a specialist in housing matters, was able to take time away from such matters to report in his own Blawg Review 115 on the extraordinary episode of the flashing Court of Appeal judge and the evidence given about his choice of underwear. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
