Search for: "GIVENS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC"
Results 141 - 160
of 356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm
In its subsequent decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:19 am
¶26 (quoting Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:19 am
¶26 (quoting Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 6:56 am
CGS Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:56 am
Gary Klausner, denied certification even though he preliminary concluded that “[t]he putative classes appear to meet the requisites of Rule 23(a),” including the “rigorous” commonality standard established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:57 am
The Eighth Circuit, in a 2:1 decision, upheld that verdict, rejecting arguments by the employer that (1) the case should never have been certified given differences in time spent among the class; (2) the use of statistics was improper and constituted “Trial by Formula” in violation of the teachings of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:00 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2010 U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 9:19 am
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 8:20 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in 2011 in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm
Ryan v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 9:51 pm
Taco Cabana, Inc., 505 U.S. 763 (1992); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:01 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 531 F. 3d 127, 133 (2d Cir. 2008) (internal quotation marks omitted)). [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:51 am
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., 2014-Ohio-2998 (2nd Dist.) [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:10 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a Michigan federal district court ruled that an employee who was terminated by Wal-Mart after testing positive for validly obtained medical marijuana stated no legal claims for wrongful discharge. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:57 pm
Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
(citing Caliber Bodyworks, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 8:18 am
Bayer argued that plaintiffs complaint was deficient under Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:41 pm
The court expressed some concern over whether the claims could satisfy the Rule 23(a) requirement of commonality given the Supreme Court's decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:37 am
Just two years ago, in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:41 pm
” Relying on Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
