Search for: "GROOMS v. STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2016, 1:15 pm
In State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 6:58 pm
On March 28, the Southern District of Texas granted a preliminary injunction in Pet Silk, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
The employer moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:32 am
Additional Resources: Normandin v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 3:40 pm
Obaidi v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 9:07 am
LEXIS 26385, Feb. 16, 2010) and dismissed a claim by a Sunni Muslim prisoner that his rights under RLUIPA were violated by prison grooming polices that required him to wear short hear and be clean shaven.In Ingram v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Kingston v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 3:12 pm
Ct. 2012); and Iseberg v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
We explore the marketing of branded service and the law's response through an analysis of Jespersen v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm
In Vinning El v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
The appellant, Mark Sutherland, began corresponding on Grindr with a member of a PH group, Groom Resisters Scotland, posing as a thirteen year old boy (“the decoy”). [read post]
4 May 2016, 3:36 pm
Thompson (Prisoners – Grooming Policies) on May 2, 2016. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
R (NM) Secretary v of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1816 - Read judgment This case concerned whether the prison authorities were in breach of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 and the Equality Act 2010 when they failed to conduct a form investigation into a sexual assault against a prisoner with learning disabilities, NM. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
In a recent decision, Devore-Thompson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:56 am
In Holt v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:15 am
Based on one federal court’s decision in Rogers v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
However, EEOC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
However, EEOC v. [read post]
