Search for: "Gill v. People" Results 141 - 160 of 246
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2013, 9:40 pm
The court would have to send a copy of the draft order to people who have registered an interest in seeing such orders and include sufficient information to provide them with a basis to challenge the application. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
[Abstract]. 58 Villanova Law Review 371-470 (2013).Symposium:  Law, Religion, and Lautsi v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Chest 377, 377, 378 (1980); Otto Wong, “Using Epidemiology to Determine Causation in Disease,” 3 Natural Resources & Env’t 20, 23 (1988); Ben Armstrong, Claude Tremblay, and Gilles Theriault, “Compensating Bladder Cancer Victims Employed in Aluminum Reduction Plants,” 30 J. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
», signée par Gilles Proulx. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Exemplary Damages and Article 10 (again) Second, there is the argument, referred to by Gill Phillips on this blog last week and repeated by Lord Black in his speech, that exemplary damages are contrary to Article 10. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:04 pm
Kingsley Egbuonu's return to Africa's official IP websites for Afro-IP takes him back to Mali, while Ron Coleman's Likelihood of Confusion takes us on a trip to a crazy world -- this one -- in which it is possible to contemplate the existence of a brand that its owner doesn't even want people to mention. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
This year, the Supreme Court of Canada will likely decide Canadian National Railway v McKercher LLP. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 8:30 am by azatty
A recent post of his reminded me that the use of the word “green” may be getting a bit green around the gills. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 11:55 am by Legal Beagle
But from this week in Scottish courts, people helping them with their cases, who are known as McKenzie friends, will be granted the right to speak for them. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Most people appreciate the enormous strains on the MoJ and court service to save money and that the premises in Wells St must be expensive. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 4:46 pm by Betsy McKenzie
In this court case (companion case to Gill v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:31 am by Máiréad Enright
Experienced grassroots women’s organisations are deeply divided on the government’s proposals, with some contending that the new crime would help inform individuals about their legal entitlements, enact a deterrant and enable young people at risk of forced marriage to invoke the new crime in resisting family pressure, while others argue that fear of criminalising their families will deter young people from coming forward (Aisha Gill’s research is… [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm by Matt Cameron
Dept. of Health and Human Services, No. 10-2204  (1st Cir. 5/13/12), aff’g Gill v. [read post]