Search for: "Givens v. Social Security Administration"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2008, 8:54 am
Databases owned by Social Security and U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
Wade if given the opportunity. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am
Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:31 am
Equality of protection under the laws implies not only accessibility by each one, whatever his race, on the same terms with others to the courts of the country for the security of his person and property, but that in the administration of criminal justice he shall not be subjected, for the same offense, to any greater or different punishment. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
Activist groups nurture new political ideas and social structures. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:25 am
The recent criminal case of R. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3134 : August 30, 2011 Judge: Shepherd Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Appellee applied for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1382. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3134 : August 30, 2011 Judge: Shepherd Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Appellee applied for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1382. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Bohack v DiNapoli, 197 AD3d 1384, the Appellate Division noted that Petitioner "bore the burden of establishing that his disability arose from an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law"* and Respondent's determination in this regard will be sustained "if supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Bohack v DiNapoli, 197 AD3d 1384, the Appellate Division noted that Petitioner "bore the burden of establishing that his disability arose from an accident within the meaning of the Retirement and Social Security Law"* and Respondent's determination in this regard will be sustained "if supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
Anyone who understands anything about security knows that national security justifications are yet another flat-out lie from the Trump administration. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:10 am
See, e.g., Social Security Bd. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
In Dart v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The SEC has mandated environmental disclosure at least as far back as the Nixon Administration. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 7:03 am
Glenn emphasizes that a court should give additional weight to a structural conflict where the decision maker has a history of biased claim administration or helped a claimant obtain a social security award it then disregarded. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am
Utah v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:14 am
Doctrine of Estoppel not available to bar an administrative action to correct an error notwithstanding its adverse impact on the individual Matter of Olick v D'Alessandro, 2011 NY Slip Op 50718(U), Supreme Court, New York County, Judge Manuel J. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 1:02 pm
“Religious activities should be carried out within the scope stipulated by laws and regulations … and should not interfere with educational, judicial and administrative affairs as well as social life,” Xi said. [read post]
