Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 141 - 160
of 8,122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:32 pm
The AEP v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:08 am
The decision in State of California ex rel Bartlett v Miller is helpful precedent that keeps the door open to such outsider whistleblowers. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:14 am
The landmark Alexander Van Horn v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 10:55 am
States like California have a great deal on the line in Janus v. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 10:52 pm
Here is the abstract:In Stone v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 6:00 am
(Good luck with that.) [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:12 am
See Klay v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:16 pm
The California Supreme Court overruled its previous decision in Gentry v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 10:32 am
Apparently the good thing about being a sovereign is that if you don't like a judicial decision, you can change it.The question here is whether a cost award in favor of the California State Bar is dischargeable in bankruptcy. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:53 am
This morning I've been reading the oral arguments (pdf) from Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
Both the California Supreme Court, in Sullivan v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:53 am
” Case citation: State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
" The new law reverses a recent California Supreme Court decisions (Van Horn v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Further, Division Five of the Second Appellate Division of California Court of Appeal held in Brown v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
As reported by the California Apartment Association, sue your landlord bill, (AB 934), fails passage in the state assembly. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 11:30 am
In Jones v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:55 pm
Handyman Connection of Sacramento, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:51 pm
In a 2-1 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a California voter initiative [Proposition 8] stripping same sex couples of the right to marry is unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:23 pm
(Rittenhouse v. [read post]
