Search for: "Grant v. Board of Retirement"
Results 141 - 160
of 946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 11:41 am
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 8:10 am
v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 3:36 am
*Further, the Village Board's policy of treating retired Village mayors and Village Board members differently from active Village mayors and Village Board members did not unconstitutionally deny Kapell the equal protection of the laws, “as it reflects an orderly and rational basis for municipal expenditures. [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 2:22 am
The Court referred to CNQ v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
" * Any award of workers' compensation to Firefighter was to be designated reimbursable to the employer. ** General Municipal Law §207-a(4-a) provides that "[a]ny benefit payable pursuant to [General Municipal Law §207-a(2)] to a person who is granted retirement for disability incurred in performance of duty pursuant to [Retirement and Social Security Law §363-c] shall be reduced by the amount of the benefits that are finally determined… [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
" * Any award of workers' compensation to Firefighter was to be designated reimbursable to the employer. ** General Municipal Law §207-a(4-a) provides that "[a]ny benefit payable pursuant to [General Municipal Law §207-a(2)] to a person who is granted retirement for disability incurred in performance of duty pursuant to [Retirement and Social Security Law §363-c] shall be reduced by the amount of the benefits that are finally determined… [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
By Kevin Kulling, J.D.The Delaware Chancery Court has granted summary judgment to a former board member who challenged the appointment of a retired federal judge to serve as the sole member of special litigation committees for two Delaware limited liability companies. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:44 am
Board of Education Retirement System of City of New York, a summary order issued on November 18. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
*Further, the Village Board's policy of treating retired Village mayors and Village Board members differently from active Village mayors and Village Board members did not unconstitutionally deny Kapell the equal protection of the laws, "as it reflects an orderly and rational basis for municipal expenditures. [read post]
20 Jan 2006, 12:33 pm
WCAB (Fluid Containment, et al.), a case I posted on in connection with the Supreme Court's grant of appeal in Motor Coils MFG/WABTEC, v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 7:00 am
Supreme Court granted Altic’s petition and annulled OCM’s decision to reduce the OCM’s prescription co-pay benefit for its retired employees to the then same level of its prescription co-pay benefit it made on behalf of its active employees as set out in the collective bargaining agreement. [read post]
16 May 2011, 5:00 am
In Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
Marion City Election Board (07-21) and Indiana Democratic Party v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
Weinstein, recently announced his retirement after 52 years as a judge of the U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:48 pm
Madigan v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:34 am
Matter of Concannon v Board of Trustees of the FDNY Pension Fund, Subchapter II [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:04 am
State Employees’ Retirement System, Case No. 141909, back to the State Employees’ Retirement Board for reconsideration of petitioner’s request for benefits in light of Nason v. [read post]
