Search for: "Hand v. Board of Education" Results 141 - 160 of 1,489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2022, 5:05 am by jonathanturley
Board of Education would have upheld the racist precepts of “separate but equal” in Plessy v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 4:28 am by jonathanturley
Board of Education would have upheld the racist precepts of “separate but equal” in Plessy v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It was a time when the most common response to claims of loss and injury on the part of religious communities, who saw their traditional structures of authority being eroded and their children becoming alienated from their families’ traditional values, was to deny that liberal educational and legal policies were responsible for these changes, and to double-down on the claim that the state could be, and was, value-neutral. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 5:15 am by Florian Mueller
"In a way, Snapchat "deserved" it as its CEO attempted to help Apple on the last day (apart from closing argument) of last year's Epic Games v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
ClientEarth wrote to members of HSBC’s board supporting the demands laid out in ShareAction’s resolution. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:14 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In its statement of grounds of appeal, the appellant maintained the requests considered in the decision under appeal and filed new sets of claims as sixth to eighth auxiliary requests.The appellant argued that document D4, an educational video for an end-user, was not an enabling disclosure and was therefore not appropriate as a starting point for assessing inventive step. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:50 pm by Josh H. Escovedo
Supreme Court, in a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Gorsuch, released its decision in NCAA v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
In Melton Enterprises Ltd v Censorship of Publications Board [2003] 3 IR 623, [2003] IESC 55 (4 November 2003), the Supreme Court upheld the power in section 9 of the Censorship of Publications Act, 1946 (also here) to prohibit the publication of indecent or obscene periodicals. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Judgment was handed down in favour of the applicant in CURTIS v JASON VICTOR BISHOP TRADING AS CANBERRA NOTICE BOARD (Civil Dispute) [2022] ACAT 59 over defamatory material that was published on the Canberra Notice Board Facebook group between 15 June 2020 to 15 July 2020. [read post]