Search for: "Harbour v. Harbour"
Results 141 - 160
of 429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
A closer look at Hospira v Cubist and daptomycin micellesIPKat returns to the Hospira v Cubist case to look in more detail at the claim relating to purifying daptomycin by altering by PH.* My My Mylan: The Trademark Silver Lining for Mylan's EPIPENMylan has recently come under fire for raising the price of the EPIPEN. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 12:13 pm
In this case, I admit to harbouring very considerable doubts that it is. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
" The Court of Appeals determined that New York common law does not recognise a "public performance right" in their decision in Flo & Eddie v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm
On appeal, the Court agreed with Judge Stanton’s interpretation of the knowledge requirement stating that under Section 512(c)(1)(A) knowledge alone will not disqualify a service provider from the safe harbour protection. [read post]
Rome Court of First instances confirms once again that takedown requests do not need to include URLs
18 Jul 2016, 6:56 am
In its seminal decision in L'Oréal, in fact, that the CJEU suggested [para 122] that safe harbour protections cannot be trumped by "notifications of allegedly illegal activities or information [that are] insufficiently precise or inadequately substantiated". [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 4:02 pm
The Minister for Financial Services, Superannuation and Corporate Law, Chris Bowen MP, has announced a package of reforms to Australia’s corporate insolvency laws consisting of: reform of insolvency administrations which will include the adoption of substantially all of the recommendations made by CAMAC in its Issues in external administration report; amendment of the Corporations Act to reverse the effect of the High Court’s decision in Sons of Gwalia v Margaretic which… [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
"Just less than three years after the Court decided Roe v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 12:03 pm
, Corien PrinsAndreas Busch, "From Safe Harbour to the Rough Sea? [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 7:56 am
In Tranquil Harbour Dev., LLC v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 3:10 pm
The case is Associated British Ports v Tata Steel UK Limited. [read post]
Case Comment: Petroleo Brasileiro S.A (Respondent) v E.N.E. Kos 1 Limited (Appellant) [2012] UKSC 17
6 Aug 2012, 2:34 am
Gaudet v Brown (1873) and Great Northern Railway Co v Swaffield (1874). [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:10 am
A lively discussion of the English approach to obviousness as applied in the Hospira v Genotech patent revocation application. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:46 pm
Pulse Electronics and Stryker Corp. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
However, the PPT also includes a safe harbour provision where it can be demonstrated that the benefit was received in circumstances that were in accordance with the object and purpose of the relevant provisions. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 11:08 pm
Commissioner Hampton’s reasoning is consistent with other decisions of the Commission, including the Full Bench’s decision in Toms v Harbour City Ferries Pty Ltd [2015] FWAFB 6249, which focused on “obedience to the policy”, rather than whether the drug test established that the worker was ‘impaired’ (in a scientific sense) as a result of drug use.[4] Commissioner Hampton noted that it was neither reasonable nor workable to expect Coles “to… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 6:39 am
United States, 459 F.3d 220 (2d Cir. 2006) (better known as “Castle Harbour“) and the Fourth Circuit’s holding in Virginia Historic Tax Credit Fund LLC 2001 v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:20 pm
” Royal Harbour Yacht Club Marina Condo. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 6:49 am
The judge’s reaction was priceless: ‘Think about that for a moment.'” Harbour Antibodies BV v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:37 am
The ISPs in this action are innocent, in that they would not incur liability for trade mark infringement under English law, even in the absence of the safe harbour provisions in the E-Commerce Directive. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 4:05 pm
Madsen-Ries (as liquidators of Debut Homes Ltd (in liq) v Cooper (Debut Homes) and the long-awaited judgment in Yan v Mainzeal Property and Construction Ltd (in liq) (Mainzeal) are considered. [read post]
