Search for: "Harold v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2015, 3:46 am
 Scarcely less sad is the scrap over the annotated statute laws of the State of Georgia, recorded by Andy Johnstone on the same weblog. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am by pscamp01
United States” is by Thomas Healy who is also from Seton Hall. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:28 am by pscamp01
United States” is by Thomas Healy who is also from Seton Hall. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
In the first case, Frank v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:26 am by John Elwood
United States, 09–1555, Beer v. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:12 am
Then I remembered a passage from Dean Harold Koh's book, The National Security Constitution, in which he describes how government lawyers referred to United States  v. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 9:51 pm
Harold Wegner in IPFrontline.com May 22, 2006 article in Chemical & Engineering News [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am by Anna Salvatore
Pompeo added that if Russian poisoning is the culprit, the United States will join the European Union in supporting a thorough investigation. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 11:12 pm by Florian Mueller
Not one judge has so far considered this patent valid, other than Judge Koh, of course.And Morrison & Foerster's Harold McElhinny (whose Apple v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 12:34 pm
From an administrative law standpoint, this case is potentially significant because it could clarify the Court's demarcation in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Public utility regulation as a distinct field of law arose at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries in the United States. [read post]
10 May 2010, 8:46 am
Harold Koh has called this case the Brown v. [read post]