Search for: "Held v. Kaufman" Results 141 - 160 of 218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In any case, since RFL’s retainer was signed only on behalf of the LIMGA shareholders, not on behalf of any entity in which Gabay or LIMA had a legal interest, RFL did not have a duty to the plaintiffs (see Strujan v Kaufman & Kahn, LLP, 168 AD3d 1114, 1115; Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696, 698), and the alleged conflict of interest did not arise. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
Thereafter, a jury trial was held to determine the amount of damages. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Kaufman v Anker, 42 NY2d 835, the Appellate Division opined that "[b]ased upon the record presented, the [ACS'] determination that [Plaintiff] fell short of completing the probationary period was rational and not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Matter of Kaufman v Anker, 42 NY2d 835, the Appellate Division opined that "[b]ased upon the record presented, the [ACS'] determination that [Plaintiff] fell short of completing the probationary period was rational and not arbitrary or capricious or contrary to law. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 8:05 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Hempstead, 24 NY3d 96, 103; Matter of Wambold v Village of Southampton Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 140 AD3d 891, 892-893; Matter of Kaufman v Incorporated Vil. of Kings Point, 52 AD3d 604, 608). [read post]