Search for: "Hill v. Daniels" Results 141 - 160 of 474
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Gerald Kogan looks at Jones v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:10 am by Barry Sookman
This Internet exceptionalism provided protection for sites designed specifically to purvey offensive materials, even in the absence of any good faith efforts to address the abusive content.[2] The breadth of the immunity was recently summarized and criticized by Danielle Citron and Benjamin Wittes in a law review article published in the United States: Platforms have been protected from liability even though they republished content knowing it might violate the law, encouraged users to post… [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:42 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, C. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Julie Burkhart warns that “[t]he confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court will lead to a decision to overturn or gut the essence of Roe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 7:08 am by Andrew Hamm
’” Alexander Bolton of The Hill reports that “Democrats say the prospect that the Senate will confirm a Trump nominee who could overturn the Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 2:54 am by Walter Olson
” [Daniel Fisher on dismissal of San Francisco, Oakland cases] Rhode Island files first state lawsuit, cheered by mass tort veteran Sen. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At Law360 (subscription required), Daniel Walfish discusses the impact of the court’s decision in Lucia v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
Daniel Hemel analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed for The Hill, Julia Raifman and Sandro Galea discuss recent research they conducted that “sheds light on how the denial of services to same-sex couples — such as decorating a wedding cake, in [Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]