Search for: "Hogan v State"
Results 141 - 160
of 643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2019, 1:30 am
Luckily, the CJEU is slated to decide this question, and Advocate General Hogan gave their thoughts on this earlier this summer.The case of Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v BALEMA GmbH concerned balsamic vinegar from the region of Modena – "Aceto Balsamico di Modena" (PGI application here). [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 1:30 am
Luckily, the CJEU is slated to decide this question, and Advocate General Hogan gave their thoughts on this earlier this summer.The case of Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v BALEMA GmbH concerned balsamic vinegar from the region of Modena – "Aceto Balsamico di Modena" (PGI application here). [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 11:30 am
In Case C-432/18 Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v Balema GmbH, Advocate General Hogan has advised the Court of Justice to rule that the terms "Aceto", "Balsamico" and "Aceto Balsamico" should not qualify for protection as Protected Geographical Indications (PGIs) under Regulation No. 1151/2012. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 1:33 am
Hogan, the U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 6:08 am
See State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:07 am
On June 20, 2019, the Supreme Court released its long-awaited decision in PDR v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:48 pm
Hogan, 849 F.3d 114, 148 fn.19 (4th Cir. 2017); United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 6:14 am
The 6th Circuit Court ruled last summer in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 3:19 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 3:19 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm
Holden of Oklahoma State University discussed the regulation of sports betting following the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
Ontario’s Human Rights Commission had previously taken the position that gender identity was still a protected ground under the Ontario Human Rights Code based on the ban against sex discrimination, and the Human Rights Tribunal agreed with this interpretation in several cases, including in Hogan v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 2:44 pm
Benisek and Rucho v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:05 am
Before United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:02 am
The 1709 Blog is delighted to host the following reflections by friend Federica Pezza (Hogan Lovells) on films, subtitles and ... copyright (what else?). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 7:30 pm
District Judge Thomas Hogan said he couldn’t grant it because he was bound by D.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
