Search for: "Hogan v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 642
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2019, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
Luckily, the CJEU is slated to decide this question, and Advocate General Hogan gave their thoughts on this earlier this summer.The case of Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v BALEMA GmbH concerned balsamic vinegar from the region of Modena – "Aceto Balsamico di Modena" (PGI application here). [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 11:30 am
In Case C-432/18 Consorzio Tutela Aceto Balsamico di Modena v Balema GmbH, Advocate General Hogan has advised the Court of Justice to rule that the terms "Aceto", "Balsamico" and "Aceto Balsamico" should not qualify for protection as Protected Geographical Indications (PGIs) under Regulation No. 1151/2012. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:07 am by Mark Brennan and Arpan Sura
On June 20, 2019, the Supreme Court released its long-awaited decision in PDR v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm by Bobby Chen
Holden of Oklahoma State University discussed the regulation of sports betting following the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Ontario’s Human Rights Commission had previously taken the position that gender identity was still a protected ground under the Ontario Human Rights Code based on the ban against sex discrimination, and the Human Rights Tribunal agreed with this interpretation in several cases, including in Hogan v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:02 am by Eleonora Rosati
The 1709 Blog is delighted to host the following reflections by friend Federica Pezza (Hogan Lovells) on films, subtitles and ... copyright (what else?). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 7:30 pm by Patrick McDonnell
District Judge Thomas Hogan said he couldn’t grant it because he was bound by D.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 11:06 am by Bryan P. Sears
Larry Hogan’s fifth State of the State speech, praised the governor for his interest in curbing crime in Baltimore. [read post]