Search for: "Honeywell"
Results 141 - 160
of 787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2018, 9:57 pm
Ansems, Assistant General Counsel, Intellectual Property, Honeywell International; Thomas Hipkins of Fredrikson & Byron; and Jeffrey C. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:15 am
Code, which is seeking an injunction on the importation and sale of barcode readers marketed by Honeywell for the healthcare industry, alleges that Honeywell engaged in a campaign to mislead distributors about the legitimacy... [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:15 am
Code, which is seeking an injunction on the importation and sale of barcode readers marketed by Honeywell for the healthcare industry, alleges that Honeywell engaged in a campaign to mislead distributors about the legitimacy of Code’s barcode reader products as part of an effort to monopolize that market. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 8:05 am
by Dennis Crouch Honeywell v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 5:10 am
Back in August of 2017, the Federal Circuit reviewed an appeal from an inter partes reexamination in Honeywell Intl. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
By Lorene D. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:46 am
Honeywell International, Inc. et al. argued October 17, 2017. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:59 am
M-I LLC, 514 F.3d 1244, 1252–54 (Fed.Cir. 2008); and Honeywell International, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 10:36 am
Honeywell, Inc. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:03 am
Honeywell International, Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:13 am
Honeywell Int’l Inc., 357 F.3d 649, 653 [69 USPQ2d 1296] (7th Cir. 2003), was misplaced. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 10:06 am
Honeywell Int’l, No. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Honeywell International, Inc. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:05 pm
In 2009, she was named general counsel at Honeywell. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 10:41 am
Honeywell general counsel Katherine Adams takes top legal role at tech giant [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:30 pm
Honeywell International, Inc., 706 F.3d 1351 (Fed. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 5:25 am
Cellular South also made prior representations to the USPTO (in the Honeywell agreement) that its use of the letter “c” in its logo sufficiently distinguished it from another “spire” mark. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 11:04 am
” Honeywell Int’l v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 4:15 am
The court found that the Board erred in relying on inherency to dismiss evidence showing unpredictability in the art in rejecting Honeywell’s argument that a skilled artisan would not have been motivated to combine the references with a reasonable expectation of success. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 4:15 am
The court found that the Board erred in relying on inherency to dismiss evidence showing unpredictability in the art in rejecting Honeywell’s argument that a skilled artisan would not have been motivated to combine the references with a reasonable expectation of success. [read post]
