Search for: "IN RE: RULES GOVERNING COMPLAINTS ON JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT"
Results 141 - 160
of 197
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2012, 12:00 pm
Similarly, relying on judicial monitoring and reporting of misconduct has been a failure. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:59 am
All of these mechanisms the court said are operating to make sure that in most cases prosecutors know what they’re supposed to do and that it’s only in an extreme case that would be completely unpredictable where they’re going to fail. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
For instance, Judge Hand’s complaints about the “literary critic” expert witness in Nichols, have been re-lodged against witnesses with expertise in ethics. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:41 am
"Many complaints are dismissed because staff deem they do not specifically address misconduct under the agency's jurisdiction under Supreme Court rules: "Finally, of the 1,192 cases closed [in FY 2011], approximately 51% alleged no judicial misconduct. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Marshall does not supply rule of decision in present proceeding -- Bankruptcy Court may hear FCCPA action, but it cannot enter final judgment without parties' consent, as FCCPA action is non-core proceeding -- Discussion of effect of defendant's admission of jurisdiction -- Even if court were to relieve defendant of its consent to jurisdiction and treat proceeding as non-core proceeding without both parties' consent, court would still hear proceeding -- Exercise of permissive… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
Wizner replies that a rule requiring clear Congressional affirmation for a Bivens cause of action would effectively overrule Bivens, since Bivens is about implied causes of action. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
It’s also very prejudicial to Californians, as under the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Final Rule (“MARS”), which is the governing rule everywhere else in the country, lawyers can and do represent borrowers who are applying for loan modifications. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:10 pm
When the federal government tells private colleges how to handle such allegations, I think the Constitution kicks in: if the Government tells private colleges to deprive students of their places without due process and the colleges do so, they are state actors. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 9:48 am
What’s most disconcerting about all this is what’s glossed over when coequal branches of government enact rules to protect their turfs. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am
He shall not be servile and whenever there is proper ground for serious complaint against a judicial officer, it shall be his right and duty to submit his grievance to proper authorities.2. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
Hager: The Court reversed a Court of Appeals ruling which concluded that a detective’s statement during trial on Mr. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:28 pm
It's all of government: federal, state, local; executive branch, legislative branch, judicial branch.Oh, wait. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
Hence, the statutes’ terms must govern, even though they may compromise petitioner’s ability to prove his claim of legal malpractice. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:39 am
It is in direct contravention of judicial duty. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 11:57 pm
”The judge said it would not surprise him if someone – including the trial judge in the Mendieta case – filed a professional misconduct complaint at the Law Society of Upper Canada, the governing body for Ontario lawyers. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 8:46 am
” Proxy Access Rule Stayed On October 4, 2010, the SEC stayed its rule amendments facilitating shareholder director nominations (referred to as the proxy access rule), pending judicial review of a challenge brought by the Business Roundtable and the Chamber of Commerce of the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 7:15 am
"Your only choice is what we're asking — dismiss this. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:11 pm
He said the Office of Lawyer Regulation found in March he did not violate any rules governing attorney misconduct, but refused to provide a copy of what he said was the report clearing him. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:06 am
Why the Supreme Court ruled against the deportation of gay asylum-seekers The Independent reports: “Gay and lesbian asylum-seekers have won the right to live in Britain after the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that the Government was wrong to return refugees to countries where people had to choose between homophobic persecution or hiding their true sexual identity. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
The judicial exercise of independent judgment requires consideration of the culpability of the offenders at issue in light of their crimes and characteristics, along with the severity of the punishment in question…. [read post]
