Search for: "IN RE MOTION FOR CONFLICT COUNSEL" Results 141 - 160 of 979
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm by Jeffrey Krivis
Picture a Continuum of Conflict in which we start at one end with the filing of a litigated case. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Terry Bowen, No. 107,904 (Marion)Direct appeal; RapeJoanna LabastidaImproper admission of prior bad act evidenceInsufficient evidence of alternative means of rapeImproper response to jury question violating right to be present and public trialFailure to provide conflict-free counsel for preliminary hearingState v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:01 am by R.J. MacReady
A jury convicted Perez of aggravated robbery, and defense counsel withdrew on the date of the judgment.Perez filed a motion for new trial alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 9:14 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
(“Recitals in a judgment or signed order of the court thus control over conflicting recitals in the record. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 6:44 am by brbadmin
” “‘It is now apparent that Kenner and his co-counsel appear to have had an undisclosed financial stake in the AI program, and they experimented with it during Michel’s trial so they could issue a press release afterward promoting the program — a clear conflict of interest.'” “Zeidenberg pointed to a press release a firm called Eyelevel appears to have issued in May, which included a photo of Michel and boasted that the company’s… [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 1:19 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
HodgkinsonFailure to give lesser-included offenseFailure to appoint conflict-free counsel for IAC hearingState v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm by Rumpole
State, 17 So.3d 275 (Fla. 2009) the Supreme Court created a limited exception to striking pro se motions when the defendant has counsel. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
In summarizing what happened, we’re experimenting with a new format. [read post]
  Moreover, inclusion of indirect purchasers in the Rule 23(b)(2) injunctive class did not demonstrate that class counsel had prejudiced the state law claims of the indirect purchasers – making them inappropriate as counsel to the class – because inclusion of indirect purchasers in a Rule 23(b)(2) settlement should not extinguish their subsequent state-law claims, if any, on res judicata grounds. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am by Emma Kohse
(Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri’s defense counsel argued a motion for discovery on this same issue at a military commission hearing earlier this month.) [read post]
  And the 23(a)(4) adequacy of the named plaintiffs could be satisfied with subclasses represented by separate counsel, which would overcome the potential conflicts. [read post]