Search for: "INDIANA CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES" Results 141 - 160 of 350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2024, 8:10 am by Rick Garnett
Indiana Dep’t of Child Services, Mary and Jeremy Cox have appealed the state’s decision to remove their teenage son from their home and place him in a home where “she is [ac]cepted for who she is. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:59 pm by Joe Sanders
“But as a state we need to err on the side of protecting kids, not protecting adults. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm by MBettman
  The teachers’ obligation here was to call social services, not the police. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 10:29 am
Dept. of Child Services and Child Advocates (NFP) - Termination, affirmed. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:52 pm
In other words, when the government prohibits an individual from engaging in otherwise lawful conduct, it is important to provide the accused with notice and an opportunity to be heard. * * * The issuance of a protective order pursuant to Indiana Code Section 34-26-5 would address our concerns by providing notice to the individual, an opportunity to be heard, and, where the issuance of a protective order is justified, a clear statement that his or her conduct is… [read post]
The second incident involved an accident at an adjacent dealership in which a customer’s 13-year old child was sitting in a vehicle’s driver’s seat when the vehicle accelerated over the customer’s foot and into a pond while the child was inside. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 5:08 pm
Dept. of Child Services (NFP) - "Given the ample evidence that the conditions resulting in D.D.S.'s removal will not be remedied, we find no error in terminating Mother's parental rights. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:53 am
Marion County Division of Child Services (NFP) In the Matter of Termination of Parent-Child Relationship of J.A., M.P.B., M.L.B., A.M.S., J.S. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:52 pm by SO Issues
The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana, which is challenging Indiana's 2008 law, argues that it's unconstitutional to bar sex offenders who are no longer in prison or on probation from using basic online services. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 1:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
No need for a protection order if there is no child abuse or child neglect. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 6:51 am
Verizon informed Trooper Erdely that the subscriber of that service at that date and time was . . . [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Katherine Drabiak
Currently, TST offers the services only to patients in New Mexico, but it plans to expand into other states. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 2:15 pm by Emma Zack
There she was—a child, right in front of me, that I could love, protect, and nurture. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:48 am by Sex Offender Issues
SORNA is part of the 2006 Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, which made it a federal crime for a registered sex offender to move to another state without re-registering with that new home state. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 1:45 pm
Or consider that police in Tenaha, Texas, spent years seizing property from Black and Latinx people traveling through town, threatening the travelers that if they did not turn over their cash and disclaim their rights to it, they would be arrested on money laundering charges and, in some instances, have their children taken by child protective services. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:28 pm
To understand why he got the subpoena, it is necessary to understand how the case arose: In 2010, Trooper Matt Powell of the Pennsylvania State Police in Indiana, Pennsylvania, conducted an investigation of peer-to-peer file sharing programs that may have contained child pornography. . . . [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:23 am
Congress passed the Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Act as part of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act in 2006. [read post]