Search for: "Identification Devices v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
14 Dec 2024, 9:00 am
“Terrorist Activity” as defined in section 1182(a)(3)(B) any activity which is unlawful under the laws of the place where it is committed (or which, if it had been committed in the United States, would be unlawful under the laws of the United States or any State) and which involves any of the following: (I) The highjacking or sabotage of any conveyance (including an aircraft, vessel, or vehi [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
Upon sentencing, the court shall forward to the Division of Alcoholism and Drug Abuse's Intoxicated Driving Program Unit a copy of a person's conviction record. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 2:58 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
There is a line of cases starting with Talley v California, then McIntyre v Ohio Elections Comm’n, and running through the more recent Watchtower Bible and Tract Society, in which the Supreme Court sets out a sweeping constitutional right to anonymous religious and political speech. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm
In a rare address from the Oval Office yesterday evenin, President Barack Obama discussed the administration’s response to the rising threat of domestic terrorism in the United States following last Wednesday’s shooting in San Bernardino. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:29 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 2:53 pm
The CLIA State Operations Manual (SOM) which provides interpretive guidance to investigators conducting laboratory surveys, states that an inspector should “[v]erify that the laboratory documents all complaints and problems reported to the laboratory, and that it has a mechanism to determine which complaints require investigation. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
" Defendant argues that Ashcroft v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:53 am
In addition, the proposed rules require that CISWI units have stacks tested and monitored along with annual inspections of emissions control devices. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
”The simple fact of the matter is that, while a drug (or device) company supposedly might be able to fool some of the medical community some of the time, it’s simply not possible to fool all of the medical community all of the time. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
“Discovery,” as it is known in the United States, does not exist in Europe. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:53 am
The denial of review in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 2:42 pm
From a Justice Department press release in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Complaint lacking identification of infringing act or direct infringer failed to state a claim: Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v Softlayer Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) (EDTexweblog.com) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – ITC institutes investigation regarding certain personal data and mobile communications devices based on compliant by… [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 3:31 pm
United States, which held that “the Government must generally obtain a warrant supported by probable cause before acquiring” location records. [read post]
