Search for: "In Interest of Thomas" Results 141 - 160 of 15,403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm by Michael C. Dorf
So too during the oral argument: Justices Thomas, Alito, et al made so many spurious arguments that attempting to deal with them one by one feels like a sucker's game.Just to name a few lowlights:*    Justice Thomas wanted to know whether he could use this case to invalidate Jack Smith's appointment. [read post]
” US Ambassador to the UN Linda Thomas Greenfield called the move by Russia “baffling,” stating that it had vetoed a straightforward resolution. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 1:31 pm by Jon Brodkin
The law firm said it has signed up over 670 potential class members and "is in discussions with thousands of other individuals who are interested in joining the claim. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm by Haley Proctor
I’ll turn to those shortly, but first something a little closer to this blog, if a bit further back in time: two weeks ago, fellow blogger, Judge Thomas B. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit and any cert. petition; Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh voted to deny the stay. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
” The committee authorized subpoenas for Leo and billionaire Harlan Crow following reports that Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito accepted and did not disclose free travel and gifts from Crow, Leo, and conservative donor Robin Arkley II. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
Likewise, this Court has held that "[t]here is always a public interest in prompt execution" of the law, absent a showing of its unconstitutionality. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Gorsuch's concurrence, which was joined by Justice Thomas and Justice Alito speaks clearly to this issue. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:43 am by Daniel J. Gilman
It will be interesting to see if the FTC makes the same pitch to the court that it made to . . . well, itself in Part 3; if it does, it will be doubly interesting to see what the court makes of it. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
In a concurring opinion, Justice Thomas noted that a plaintiff asserting a Title VII claim must show more than trifling harm. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 11:35 am by Eugene Volokh
After defendants Thomas Rousseau and Trevor Valescu appeared in the action, the court directed the Clerk to provide defense counsel a copy of the order granting Plaintiff Doe permission to proceed pseudonymously. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:03 am by Josh Blackman
For those interested in reading further, we discuss the sword-shield dichotomy in Sweeping and Forcing (pp. 389–404); see also Anderson v. [read post]