Search for: "In Re: Application of Chevron"
Results 141 - 160
of 293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 4:39 pm
Natural Res. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:14 am
By imposing application of the employer mandate on non-consenting states, the Court has now set up a battle over the intergovernmental tax immunity doctrine. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Natural Res. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:22 am
The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) sued DOL, arguing that the 2010 re-interpretation was invalid because it did not go through notice-and-comment rulemaking. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:22 pm
§ 1.704(c)(8).Note that Chevron and Cuozzo are cited:Under the review provision of the APA applicable here, a court mayset aside the PTO’s actions onlyif they are “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 7:52 pm
Any gloss put on the regulation in that notice binds the public under Chevron[3] deference (though the many exceptions to Chevron are far less known). [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:47 am
But Chevron is understood and operates quite differently from most of the other statutory interpretation rules. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
With what’s left of Thanksgiving coming up, we are obligated as denizens of the Internet to do a post on things we’re thankful for. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:51 am
Application of those interpretive rules will likely result in the IRS rule failing under the first step in the Chevron analysis — there simply isn’t any ambiguity to be found in 26 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
Programs like the Texaco Star Theater,[5] sponsored by the Texaco Oil Company (now Chevron), presented sponsored content as long-form radio dramas. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 9:35 pm
Still, a doctrine that is so persistent – cited more than 66,000 times and mentioned in more than 13,000 federal court opinions – should be re-examined from time to time so that its application might be tempered by an appreciation of its flaws and changed circumstances. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:02 pm
In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 14-5505, 2014 WL 2895939 (D.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:21 pm
We have seen precisely these questions raised, and not always answered satisfactorily, in cases like the demands to Twitter for information on Wikileaks supporters or Chevron’s demands for email data to Twitter, Google and Yahoo. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
Res. 19, Tuesday, June 3, 2014, Washington, D.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 8:43 am
Texas also pointed out that the EEOC could not prevent review under the APA simply by re-characterizing its process in order to avoid judicial scrutiny under the Act. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 5:20 am
The use of the phrase “same right,” according to Defendants, demonstrates that § 3144(a)(2) does not actually grant aggrieved workers an independent cause of action, but merely references the applicable bond statute – in this case, DCLMA § 2–201.02. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:46 pm
” See, Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:23 am
Pursuing pro bono in-house – it’s not just for lawyers in private practice: When lawyers leave private practice and go in-house many may feel they are no longer easily able to pursue pro bono work, but the reality is corporate and public sector lawyers have skills that are in demand. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 1:23 am
Pursuing pro bono in-house – it’s not just for lawyers in private practice: When lawyers leave private practice and go in-house many may feel they are no longer easily able to pursue pro bono work, but the reality is corporate and public sector lawyers have skills that are in demand. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:39 pm
” But we’re still left with the phrase “established by a state” that is repeated in Section 1401. [read post]
