Search for: "In Re Asbestos Cases" Results 141 - 160 of 855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2009, 6:54 am
  The product could be found defective, and required warning, because it was designed to be used with asbestos. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:03 pm by William A. Ruskin
  Hopefully, cases like Moeller will have a trickle down effect and motivate the trial judges responsible for the asbestos dockets to re-think their approach. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 11:43 am
Company executives, as well as land owners who use asbestos-laden gravel, are fully protected from the consequences of a potential legal recourse taken by asbestos victims, as those injured will not be able to file lawsuits or, in the case of employees, asbestos claims in order to recover compensation. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:00 pm
  The Court held this way in finding that the judge overseeing the state silica multidistrict litigation erred in remanding a sailor's case to its originating court (In re: Global Santa Fe Corp., No. 07-0040, Texas Sup.; 2008 Tex. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 9:36 am by Gertler Law Firm
So unlike firms that bill by the hour, you can trust that we’re working to obtain the maximum compensation we can for you, as promptly as is feasible. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 3:24 pm
If you're going to sue AIG in Justice Ramos's court, you'd better either have a rock-solid case or you'd better be wearing asbestos underwear.Justice Ramos saved his angriest words for Starr's counsel, Rebecca Fine of Schindler, Cohen & Hochman. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
Here the two plaintiffs’ cases diverge. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:06 am by Flaxman Law Group
In many cases, workers aren’t aware of whether they’ve worked in a building with asbestos or have handled any material made with asbestos. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:25 am by David N. Crapo
Kaiser Gypsum is an asbestos mass tort Chapter 11 case. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:18 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Last year, Illinois Central Railroad won a verdict against two plaintiffs’ attorneys in Mississippi, alleging fraud in the pursuit of two asbestos cases by way of the plaintiffs’ lawyers failure to notify the railroad that the plaintiffs had participated in a prior asbestos-related case. [read post]