Search for: "In Re Federal Communications Commission, Petitioner"
Results 141 - 160
of 200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm
Question: So as you’re writing, who was the audience you had in mind? [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
Green that the habeas corpus remedy available to federal inmates does not preclude a Bivens remedy. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:29 pm
Taken together, the ever-tightening U.S. immigration laws, the dramatic increase in removals due to greatly expanded enforcement efforts, and the harshness of removing a long-term resident from family, friends, and community have contributed to the fact that many non-citizens are appealing removal decisions to the federal courts. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:15 pm
See Brief for Petitioners 44-45, n. 22. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/SUL Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:30 pm
In so holding, the Court overruled Division Three’s 2008 holding in In Re Knippling, under which that court found that community custody begins at completion of the sentence of confinement and the offender is therefore entitled to credit toward a sentence of community custody for time spent incarcerated in excess of the sentence of incarceration. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaDocket: 09-1254Issue(s): (1) Whether, in enacting a state statute extending the statute of limitations applicable to claims for the recovery of property stolen during the Holocaust against museums and galleries, the State of California was addressing an area of “traditional state responsibility” without intruding on the federal foreign affairs power; (2) whether a state statute extending the statute of limitations for the recovery of… [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:13 am
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) read its regulations and orders in a way that allowed AT&T (now Michigan Bell in Michigan) to charge its competitors only enough to cover its costs, while Michigan Bell wanted to charge market rates (which would allow the company to make a profit). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Company was whether a regulation passed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) required local exchange carriers to make their existing entrance facilities available to competitors at cost-based rates in certain circumstances. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:13 am
The petitioner collects the rents and transports them personally. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
Petitioner’s reply [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Federal Communications Comm’nDocket: 10-834Issue(s): Whether a reviewing court has the discretion under Section 706 of the Administrative Procedure Act to decline to set aside, or provide any remedy for, unlawful agency action? [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
If any other paid petitions are re-distributed for this conference, we will add them below as soon as their re-distribution is noted on the docket. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Petitioner's reply Title: Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am
Attorney’s Office nor an agent of the federal law enforcement agency. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:10 pm
Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Federal Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply The following petitions have been re-listed for the conference of December 15. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:54 pm
Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Docket: 10-329Issue(s): (1) Whether the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and the Federal Communications Commission's Triennial Review Remand Order permit incumbent local telephone companies to charge competing telephone companies competitive rates for entrance facilities used for interconnection; and (2) whether the lower court provided the appropriate level of deference to the FCC's interpretation of its regulations.Certiorari-Stage… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
Justice Alexander then noted that, should the continued viability of Standlee be directly presented to the supreme court during her tenure, he would be included to advance Justice Utter’s position in his dissent in that case, where he argued, “Where the sole reason advocated for petitioner’s violation of his parole is the commission of criminal acts upon which he has been adjudged not guilty by application of the beyond a reasonable doubt standard in the superior… [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 5:58 am
Hynes would be compelled to borrow Trump's trademark tagline: "You're fired. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
“Local governments and businesses must ensure they are following the federal PCB rules which are intended to protect communities and our critical natural resources. [read post]
