Search for: "In Re Interest of Brook P."
Results 141 - 160
of 171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
We’re victims, too! [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 5:03 am
I am indebted to Thomas Wright, the Brookings scholar and frequent writer on strategy, for offering three very broad categories and for immediately pointing out the most interesting debates that are happening within each. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The fact that Trump made his decision to remove the troops shortly after a phone call with Erdogan has raised alarm bells from policymakers, as well as government ethics watchdog groups who have long seen Trump’s extensive business interests as a potential area for conflicts-of-interest. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
The public interest in corporate settlements. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm
Jefferson Street Phoenix, Arizona 85003 Re: Our Client: Lisa Randall CR2008-132791 Dear Rick: I hope this letter finds you in good health. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
Meanwhile, as Roy Greenslade reported, the Port Talbot Magnet project in South Wales is asking the public to donate £150 to sponsor a court reporter for a day, as part of its P! [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
But courts have also identified a need to protect states’ authority and interests by limiting removal to situations in which a federal defense is applicable, hence, an additional requirement for removal. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight the top fifty pieces of 2017 authored by The Regulatory Review staff contributors. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Brooks, No. 05-4602, 05-4603, 05-4604, 05-4605, 05-4616 In a drug related prosecution, judgment is vacated and remanded in part where the court erred in declining a request that it give instructions requiring the jury to make an essential threshold determination of drug quantity and establish the penalty range for each individual conspiracy defendant, which resulted in a defendant receiving a sentence in excess of the maximum established by section 841(b)(1)(c). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 8:49 pm
Further undermining the meaning of any confidence intervals or p-values from the Jick study was the multiple testing and comparisons that took place within the Jick cohort. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 7:31 pm
But they fail to explain why this is needed; how such detentions would not re-trigger the same international approbation and condemnation that has long accompanied the detentions at Guantánamo; where the detainees would be held; or how they would protect against blowback. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
The Australian newspaper has an interesting piece on the tweeting situation in Australian courts, quoting Professor Mark Pearson (@journlaw on Twitter), who says: “Both the courts and the media need to exchange in a discussion about this topic. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
”); In re Comiskey, 554 F.3d 967, 973 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
”[2] The time is indeed ripe for us to re-examine how we assess bank mergers under the statutory framework that Congress has enacted. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
Phillips & Brooks/Gladwin, Inc., 529 F.3d 1364, 1376 (Fed. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
John's James Boyle thepublicdomain Duke Donald Braman donaldbraman George Washington Barbara Bressler bbressle DePaul Annemarie Bridy AnnemarieBridy Idaho Kim Brooks SchulichLawDean Dalhousie Rosa Brooks brooks_rosa Georgetown Dorothy A. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 11:08 am
The bill will dramatically degrade the Internet experience for everyone and will empower a new censorship-focused regulator who has no interest or expertise in balancing complex and competing interests. [read post]
