Search for: "In Re J. B" Results 141 - 160 of 4,240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2009, 4:54 am
timeline summarizing the major events:The Examining Division (ED) simultaneously issued (a) a decision pursuant to R 89 EPC 1973 and (b) an interlocutory revision decision pursuant to A 109(1) EPC 1973, both decisions relating to the decision to grant. [10] The question is then, what was the effect of these actions with respect to the issue of whether the (parent) application remained pending within the meaning of R 25(1) EPC 1973 ? [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:27 pm by familoo
In the light of Re B, Re B-S this is counter intuitive, but I suppose one could say that to apply a presumption would be to adopt a linear analysis, only starting at the other end of the line. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:05 pm
Segundo ele, a secretaria do STF, em ato administrativo, autorizado por portaria da Presidência da Corte, devolveu o processo à origem, isto é, ao Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Minas Gerais (TJ-MG), com base no artigo 543-B do CPC, pois o tema constitucional versado no RE já tinha sua repercussão geral reconhecida. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 10:28 am by admin
Tous les fournisseurs existent déjà localement et dans tous les secteurs, il est donc souhaitable, si vous voulez vous mesurer, être déjà sur place en créant votre LLC sous la loi de Floride. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 6:13 am by Carl Trudeau
Rappelons que cette loi prévoit une réforme majeure des lois québécoises en matière de santé et de sécurité du travail. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:54 am
In re J & J Property Company, LLC, Serial No. 97175429 (February 29, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 9:00 pm
La décision T1895/06, déjà commentée sur le blog K's law, s'intéresse à un problème d'autorité de la chose jugée (res judicata). [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 102(b) if it discloses every claim limitation. [read post]