Search for: "In Re Marshall" Results 141 - 160 of 3,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 8:19 am
as Cleveland-Marshall Legal Studies Paper No. 15-284. [read post]
29 May 2008, 1:11 pm
  His article contains a short summary of this year's patent verdicts to date, noting that while Boston Scientific's losses were initially against the local trend of defense verdicts in patent cases, they're consistent with the more recent trend of plaintiffs rebounding with wins in Marshall and Lufkins after earlier losses in Sherman and Marshall. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Dan Ernst
“Students, professors, visitors,” said Marshall with a squeak, “they don’t seem to realize we’re here. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:14 pm
The fire marshal's office ruled the fire an arson about 3:30 p.m. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 3:15 pm by Elie Mystal
JOE BIDEN'S ANSWER ON BUSING IS BAD: When your opponent is on the side of Thurgood Marshall, and you're on the side of Jesse Helms, you're losing the argument. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by Richard M. Re
Re Chief Justice John Marshall once veered toward tautology in asserting that the Supreme Court “must take jurisdiction, if it should. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:00 am by Kevin
The trouble came about because there was a real air marshal on board, who knows (because he is one) that real air marshals don't tell other passengers they're air marshals, because that would largely defeat the purpose of having air marshals. [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:57 am
Over at the relatively new Bartlett Blog, Tad Bartlett provides a blow-by-blow of the recent Fifth Circuit en banc arguments, including the In re Volkswagen venue case that’s generating a lot of discussion these days because it threatens the Marshall “rocket docket. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 2:52 am
So in this case, it seems to be, If you're a Republican and you want to misbehave sexually, make sure it's with a chick. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 7:00 am
The new scope of the exception after Marshall is best summed up by the following passage from Marshall: "when one court is exercising in rem jurisdiction over a res, a second court will not assume in rem jurisdiction over the same res. [read post]