Search for: "In re: Harper v. Harper"
Results 141 - 160
of 300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2010, 8:50 pm
(Patents Post Grant Blog) TiVo’s change in horses leads to termination of patent re-examination; TiVo shares on the rise after favourable USPTO re-exam decision (Patents Post-Grant) (IAM) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Acer – Motion to compel due diligence report denied in light of nondisclosure agreement: WI-Lan, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:38 pm
(Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts accepts re-examination result in deciding preliminary injunction motion: Red Bend v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Among his most notable cases are Halbert v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:31 am
June Besek: How should we be weighing predictability v. nuanced analysis? [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:45 pm
Lenz v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, October 27, 2008 US v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm
To frame that discussion, I plan to have participants talk about this perspective given by the Supreme Court in Harper & Row v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:17 pm
The Courts came to the same conclusion in Girling v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:04 pm
We are not speaking of the POLL tax, or the requirement of a fee to vote in elections, the Jim Crow-era attempts by some states to prevent minority groups from exercising their new 15th Amendment given right, which existed nationwide in federal elections until the 24th Amendment was ratified, and what took the Harper v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm
To frame that discussion, I plan to have participants talk about this perspective given by the Supreme Court in Harper & Row v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 8:01 am
More on Baze v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 1:00 pm
But I could have been writing about Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6, the case in which the Supreme Court of Canada concluded that Marc Nadon, Prime Minister Harper’s nominee to fill its vacant seat, was ineligible. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:04 pm
To frame that discussion, I plan to have participants talk about this perspective given by the Supreme Court in Harper & Row v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:15 pm
It also means, however, that the AP sees the lead as the classic "heart of the work," (as in Harper & Row v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:17 pm
The Courts came to the same conclusion in Girling v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:19 am
Chairman, we’re both friends of Elena Kagan, and I don’t think we’re willing to go beyond that” (the Associated Press via the New York Times). [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:51 pm
Nakhuda v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Hanover Star v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:19 am
Harper & Row: courts of appeal can review district court findings of fair use as a matter of law. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 8:04 pm
Other examples of remedial efforts taken too far include Justice Zucker’s decision last year in R. v. [read post]
