Search for: "In re: S.D. & S.D" Results 141 - 160 of 830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  We have to think that asbestos plaintiffs are going to have a field day with Weeks – more, perhaps, than even generic plaintiffs, since the learned intermediary rule still applies to prescription drug cases.Anyway, we could go through each of these policy considerations at length, but we’re not going to. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:09 am
Rptr.3d 551 (App. 2007) (relevance of FDA compliance in strict liability); (14) In re Neurontin Marketing &;amp; Sale Practices Litigation, 244 F.R.D. 89 (D. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 10:06 am
See In Re: Digitek Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1968, JPMDL.; No. 08-md-1968, S.D. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:16 am
Similasan Corp., 306 F.R.D. 635, 639 (S.D. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 9:35 am by Schachtman
Back in 2001, in the aftermath of the silicone gel breast implant litigation, I participated in a Federal Judicial Center (FJC) television production of “Science in the Courtroom, program 6” (2001). [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:46 am by admin
See In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:50 pm by Stephen Wm. Smith
The requested warrant directed AT&T “to initiate a signal to determine the location of TT1 at such times and intervals as directed by law enforcement for a period of 30 days. [read post]