Search for: "In re Bartlett"
Results 141 - 160
of 437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2014, 7:27 am
Nonetheless, we’re satisfied. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:30 am
We’re used to all sorts of lax standards that give plaintiffs the benefit of the doubt on what the facts might be. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:05 am
Smith & Philip Donoho, RLUIPA: Re-Aligning Burdens of Proof, Clarifying Freedoms, and Re-Defining Responsibilities, (New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, Forthcoming).Zachary R. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 12:00 pm
If they're true, it makes you wonder about a) the effectiveness of TDCJ contract monitoring with private prisons and b) whether Corrections Corporation of America's recently announced commitment to preventing recidivism and reentry programs could possibly jibe with the organization's historic institutional culture.In the meantime, add the Bartlett State Jail to the list of facilities the Legislature might consider shuttering if they decide to close more prisons. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 1:41 pm
In In re Actos (Pioglitazone) Prods. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
Similarly in In re Fosamax Litigation, 2012 WL 181411 (D.N.J. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
In re Darvocet, Darvon & Propoxyphene Products Liability Litigation, 2012 WL 3842045, at *7-8 (E.D. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
(Remember, the Bartlett case came out of New Hampshire.) [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:04 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:07 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
To the extent they’re based on the continued marketing of the drugs, these claims are disguised stop selling claims preempted by Bartlett. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
1 May 2014, 4:59 am
So we read the decision in In re: Yasmin and Yaz (Drospirenone) Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation (Gannon), No. 3:13-cv-10143-DRH-PMF, 2014 U.S. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 10:11 am
Thanks to Terry Henryat Blank Rome for sending along today’s preemption decision in In re Fosamax (Alendronate Sodium) Products Liability Litigation (No. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:59 am
H/T Everett Bartlett [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:50 am
“You’re going to leave this room, and you’re never going to come back. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 1:04 am
” Response: Tailor your resume to the particular position for which you’re applying. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 1:04 am
” Response: Tailor your resume to the particular position for which you’re applying. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 1:04 am
” Response: Tailor your resume to the particular position for which you’re applying. [read post]
