Search for: "In re Care & Treatment of Thomas" Results 141 - 160 of 350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2017, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
McDonald J confirmed that given the gravity of the issue in dispute, it [was] not appropriate for the local authority simply to … consent to immunisation pursuant to the provisions of s 33(3) of the Children Act 1989 on the basis of its shared parental responsibility for SL under the interim care order (see A Local Authority v SB, AB & MB) [2010] 2 FLR 1203 and Re Jake (Withholding Medical Treatment) [2015] EWHC 2442 (Fam)). [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
(As a bonus, all prior designations made over the last 18 years also got the renew-or-F-you treatment). [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 3:09 pm by Michael Grossman
Law professors Thomas McGarity and Sid Shapiro opined on the need for Texas to strengthen its workers’ compensation laws and among other things end the employer opt-out. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:36 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
This is the second full commentary on “The New Trail of Tears” (TNToT), written by Naomi Schaefer Riley (NSR or the author). [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 9:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
 The United Nations special rapporteur who examines issues of torture has sought access to the detainees for years, seeking to document their treatment while in custody. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:30 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Justice Alito concurs only in the judgment with a much more careful treatment. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:09 am by Bill Marler
The mainstay of therapy is supportive treatment in intensive care, and mechanical ventilation in case of respiratory failure, which is common. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Ct. 831, 849 n.2 (2015) (Thomas, J., dissenting). [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 3:02 am by Jon Gelman
Thomas, Saint Paul Minnesota for her undergraduate degree in Sociology with a minor in Criminal Justice. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
Rueda argues that because the unsigned opinion of Judge Davidson was his first decision, he could not re-determine the merits in a subsequently signed decision. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
Civ. 1ère, No. 13-23566.March was all about the 'Blurred Lines' in copyright and a US Jury's decision to award $7.3 million to the Estate of Marvin Gaye on the basis that Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke’s soul-inspired pop song "Blurred Lines" too closely mirrored Gaye’s 1977 single "Got to Give It Up". [read post]