Search for: "In re Grant" Results 141 - 160 of 33,911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 10:36 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
The trial court held that it did not apply, and it granted the defendant’s motion for judgment at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case. [read post]
22 May 2011, 7:52 pm by Aaron Barkoff
In Re: Cyclobenzaprine Hyldrochloride Extended-Release Capsule Patent Litigation, No. 09-md-2118-SLR (D. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 3:09 pm by Carl Neff
In the recent decision of In re UnitedHealth Group, Inc. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:53 am by Scott A. McKeown
Winter 2012 – New Rules Early 2012 is shaping up to be an exciting time for patent law, particularly for those focused on post grant patent practice. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:28 am
When drivers are distracted or under the influence, they’re not safely sharing the road with other motorists and roadway users. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 7:21 pm
As I've often discussed, there's been a lot going on in the California Court of Appeal in response to the nearly uniform decisions of the last several Governors (Davis & Terminator) to reverse the recommended grant of parole to anyone convicted of murder. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:48 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
In granting summary judgment in a defective beer bottle case (where the injuries seemed insignificant), a Maryland court provides a review of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine in California, including a review of what is usually the biggest battle ground in making a res ipsa case: whether the defendant had exclusive control. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
  It is to be expected that re-opening the intrinsic record via post grant file histories will often include substantively new discussion of various claim terms. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 9:41 pm
Girish Telang, Managing Director of Roche Scientific India said that "the court wants the patent granted on Valgancyclovir to be re-examined before January 31, 2009. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:35 am by Don Cruse
Today, the Court has granted the motion for rehearing but has not (yet) withdrawn its opinions and has not (yet) set the case for re-argument, if that is its intention. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
We hold that the Board’s approach is contrary to our precedent.Of In re Doll: The patent examiner recognized that he was bound by our precedent In re Doll, 419 F.2d 925 (C.C.P.A. 1970). [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 7:20 am by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
In 2012, when the defendant was first charged with sexual exploitation of a minor, he filed a motion to suppress the incriminating evidence, which the trial court granted. [read post]