Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 141 - 160
of 15,395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
In In re Google Referrer Header Privacy Litigation, ___ F.3d ___ (9th Cir. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 7:03 am
Feb. 10, 2009)(New Mexico).Appeal of sentence for unauthorized re-entry to United States by previously deported alien.HELD: District court did not abuse its discretion by declining to vary downward from sentencing guidelines based on defendant's professed health-related reason for unlawful re-entry to United States (i.e., to obtain HIV medications). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:45 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 902 contains a list of self-authenticating evidence, i.e., evidence that "require[s] no extrinsic evidence of authenticity in order to be admitted.... [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:50 pm
In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 897 (Fed. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
They’re issued impermeable bubbles? [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:26 pm
With China recording an unexpectedly huge trade deficit in February 2012, the punditocracy has rushed to opine on the potential effects of Chinese "re-balancing" - i.e., a shift away from economic growth driven by exports and foreign investment (due mainly to relatively cheap labor and currency) to growth driven more by domestic consumption. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 6:46 am
As Levin summarizes, "[a]lthough the various tools seem perfectly reasonable individually," (i.e., textualist, literalist, purposivist, legal process, precedent) "in the aggregate, they can lead to ridiculous results. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
Since Google, Google News, Facebook, Twitter - i.e., the world of new and social media - entered your life, do you think you're more informed? [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
Since Google, Google News, Facebook, Twitter - i.e., the world of new and social media - entered your life, do you think you're more informed? [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 10:06 am
Then, he re-entered the United States (after being deported for having a gun - but not for entering illegally) and he is charged for re-entering the United States, illegally (for which he is officially charged with entering the country illegally which is how he came to be in possession of a gun in the United States in the first place but no one bothered to notice that he was not an American citizen with a gun in the United States and so was not deported for that fact,… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 7:12 am
In re Seid, 161 F.2d 229, 231 (CCPA 1947). [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 7:12 am
In re Seid, 161 F.2d 229, 231 (CCPA 1947). [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:27 pm
We’re pleased to announce a new scholarship fund, the Helen B. and Lewis E. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 6:40 am
On October 28, 2014, the Court of Appeals rendered its long awaited decision in In re Lawrence, 2014 NY Slip Op 07291, reversing the decision by the Appellate Division in which it was held that (1) a revised retainer agreement, under which the law firm received 40% of the net recovery (i.e. $44 million) was procedurally and substantively unconscionable and that fees should be determined under the original retainer; and (2) the claim to recover gifts made by the… [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 9:30 am
Guy dumps the motion stuff (i.e. the stuff the judge told him to get) and hires legal assistant to do the work for him.Bottom line, I guess the old adage that if you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there applies. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 7:02 pm
So, given the unconstitutionality of the present Act, the successor to the murderer would be from his/her own party, i.e., the Secretary of State (assuming natural-born citizenship). [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:25 am
In addition to the above, which a good litigator can fit to almost any circumstance, there is the possibility of an annulment, set forth at §1629 of the catechism:For this reason (or for other reasons that render the marriage null and void) the Church, after an examination of the situation by the competent ecclesiastical tribunal, can declare the nullity of a marriage, i.e. that the marriage never existed. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 12:39 pm
Specifically, § 315(a) provides that patent owners “may appeal under the provisions of section 134 [i.e. to the Board] and may appeal under the provisions of sections 141 through 144 [i.e. to the Federal Circuit],” as well as participate in any appeal brought by a third-party requester. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:15 am
You may – or may not – be aware of what the meeting is about, but you’re a little rattled. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:15 am
You may – or may not – be aware of what the meeting is about, but you’re a little rattled. [read post]
