Search for: "In re J.C."
Results 141 - 160
of 170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2013, 10:43 am
In re Guardianship of J.C., 129 N.J. 1, 19 (1992). [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
J.C. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 2:14 am
There was major litigation in the 2020s on the subject of agents which established that a simple ‘bot’ such as the one described above, was a res not persona. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:24 pm
In 1960, J.C. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
First, there have been some stumbles among activists, including the blunders made by Pershing Square in changing the leadership of J.C. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:23 am
However, there the appellate court (in a decision that split the court 3 Justices to 2), reversed the order of Schuyler County Family Court Judge J.C. [read post]
22 May 2019, 2:29 pm
” If you’re not paying attention, California’s law sounds a lot like the FTC’s regulation, right? [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
This new article of mine will be coming out next year in the Journal of Law and Religion, and I thought I'd serialize it here; there's still plenty of time for editing, so I'd love to hear people's feedback. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 10:41 pm
The first track, his cover of Stevie Wonder’s ‘What Christmas Means to Me’ (which you may have heard on J.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am
Australia’s most-decorated living soldier, Ben Roberts-Smith, lost his defamation case against three newspapers that accused him of war crimes in Afghanistan. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:12 am
CHRISTY CARTY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND FOR B.C., J.C. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
We lawyers have to keep such secrets about people as part of our jobs, but we're used to it, and we're handsomely compensated for it. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Court Upholds Removal of Child From Parents, Related to Child's Transgender Identity
21 Oct 2022, 3:45 pm
(Mother) and J.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
This may be a reason why such mutual pseudonymity is so rare.[12] [1] In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 97 (D.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
This may be a reason why such mutual pseudonymity is so rare.[12] [1] In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 97 (D.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:05 pm
(Indeed, using Lexis for this sort of study would be nearly impossible to do from scratch, as there is no simple way to re-order the result list by citation count on Lexis, or Google Scholar for that matter. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:30 pm
J.C. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:35 am
If you don’t, they’re onto something else. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 7:28 am
In re D.S., 364 N.C. 184, 193–94 (2010) (holding that noncompliance with 15-day deadline, plus 15-day extension, for filing of juvenile delinquency petition following submission of complaint did not deprive court of jurisdiction; court relies on decisions holding that a statute’s use of term “shall” for time in which to act may be directory, not mandatory). [read post]
