Search for: "In re NS"
Results 141 - 160
of 303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
This is re-posted from a post I wrote on the Transparency Project blog here. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 2:27 pm
This would allow one-for-one replacement of parts, components, accessories, and attachments to be exported or re-exported to Cuba for aircraft; as well as for commodities controlled for national security (NS) reasons. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 11:26 pm
MacDermid Printing Sol'ns L.L.C., 525 F.3d 1353, 1358 (Fed. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 1:12 pm
They aren’t able to represent themselves effectively; trade ass’ns struggle because it’s a disenfranchised industry. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:49 am
’ Background on the Direct Product Rule Under the traditional “national security” direct product rule outlined in Section 734.9 of the EAR, a non-U.S. made item is subject to the EAR when the non-U.S. made item is: (i) the direct product of U.S. technology or software that is controlled for national security (NS) reasons (or a major component of a plant that is the direct product of NS-controlled technology or software), (ii) the resulting non-U.S. made item is… [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 7:43 am
Except that ENC overcomes the NS controls for 5X002 hardware and software. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:09 am
Mai 2012 (Az. 151 Ns 169/11) bezüglich der religiösen Beschneidung von Jungen hat große Wellen geschlagen. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 8:41 am
"But the whole point is that we're looking at here isn't moral retribution - ie, allocation of blame. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 2:52 am
Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978)). [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
As far as we're aware, this is the most comprehensive and complete listing of video game cases and lawsuits that we are aware of. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:02 am
”); Nazomi Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:55 am
In re SPI Commc'ns & Mktg., Inc., 114 B.R. at 18. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:17 pm
In re Caveney, 761 F.2d 671, 676–77 (Fed. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:31 pm
Publ’ns lnt’l, Ltd., 996 F.2d 1366, 1379 (2d Cir. 1993) (title v. title) and DeClemente v. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 5:19 pm
Clare reports: "This panel session discussed intermediary liability in the digital world in key jurisdictions, including the availability of site blocking injunctions and addressed the practical effects and inherent limitations of such injunctions in the digital era.The session was moderated by Agris Bitāns, of Eversheds Sutherland. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 8:49 am
See In re Comput. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:12 pm
Verizon Commc’ns, Inc., 694F.3d 1312, 1339 (Fed. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:35 am
”); In re Ferris Corp., 59 USPQ2d 1587 (TTAB 2000) (color pink used on surgical wound dressings is functional because the actual color of the goods closely resembles Caucasian human skin); In re Orange Commc’ns, Inc., 41 USPQ2d 1036 (TTAB 1996) (colors yellow and orange held to be functional for public telephones and telephone booths, since they are more visible under all lighting conditions in the event of an emergency); In re Howard S. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:07 am
Tax attorney Darrin Mish had this to say in his response by email: “I can't seem to find anything illegal about what they're doing. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
The court, relying on the 3d Circuit’s must-read opinion in In re Teleglobe Commc’ns Corp., 493 F.3d 345 (CA3 2007), recognized the joint–client doctrine and held that, to gain the doctrine’s protection, a corporation must prove a “common interest” between the parent and subsidiary that is “identical or nearly so in order that an attorney can represent them all with candor, vigor, and loyalty that our ethics require. [read post]
