Search for: "In re Sealed Documents"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Justice Department Opposes Release of Mar-a-Lago Affidavit MSN – Perry Stein (Washington Post) | Published: 8/15/2022 The Justice Department asked a judge to keep sealed the affidavit underpinning the FBI’s search of former President Trump’s Florida residence, a document thought to hold key details about the government’s investigation into the potential mishandling of classified materials. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Media Intervenors' Argument Supporting Unsealing Mar-A-Lago Search Warrant Affidavit
18 Aug 2022, 7:42 am
See In re Four Search Warrants (N.D. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 1:07 pm
Today the Federal Circuit issued an order in Miscellaenous Docket 2022-160, “In re: Unsealing of Court Case Records. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:29 am
But it may not last, as the question will then turn to whether the Biden administration validly re-classified the same information. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:35 pm
And in In re Four Search Warrants, 945 F. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 10:21 am
The seminal state case in this area is In re Investigation into Death of Cooper, 200 N.C. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:56 am
In determining whether the circular design constituted insignia, the TTAB focused on the County of Orange’s use of the mark online, on official documents, and on government buildings. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:56 am
In determining whether the circular design constituted insignia, the TTAB focused on the County of Orange’s use of the mark online, on official documents, and on government buildings. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:01 am
Apparently all the documents in the case were sealed; I moved to intervene and unseal; and six months after my motion, the District Court issued an unsealing order: 140 Aug 3, 2022 ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SEAL, re 9 Order on Motion to Seal, DENIED AS MOOT 117 MOTION to Intervene filed by Eugene Volokh. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:01 am
The panel expects to hold additional hearings in September and plans to release a written report documenting its findings. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 5:25 am
” In re K.L.M, 146 Ill. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 8:14 am
2) Liberal law profs (and some conservatives) often complain about the Court's re-writing of the 11th Amendment which provides the following:The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.This is the rare litigated constitutional provision that is completely clear. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 8:59 pm
Additionally, under the common law, a “judgment” is an order of court which gives rise to res judicata. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 3:51 am
Maybe, but that’s not what they’re arguing. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 2:27 pm
No single document can possibly seal the fate of an Illinois divorce. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 5:31 pm
The father’s child support obligations were rescinded and service of the father’s application and affidavits in support ofJ.M. were dispensed with and the documents were sealed. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:13 am
They sent their documents to the National Archives. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 9:20 am
From In re K.P. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:53 am
As I’ve already mentioned, the Court of Appeals in In re Public Records Request to DHHS did not decide whether the documents the media coalition requested were public records. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:06 pm
Redacted Confidential Disclosure re Abbott Laboratories – 10-19-2021_Redacted (1) The whistle blower document outlines many problems at the Abbott production facility in Sturgis, Michigan, including the following: The Falsification of Records – On multiple occasions, and in various ways, records have been knowingly falsified. [read post]
