Search for: "In the Matter of: FITNESS HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC." Results 141 - 160 of 371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2018, 6:13 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(collecting cases); Icon Health & Fitness,Inc. v. [read post]
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 3:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
Among many issues swirling around ICOs one is the question of how the offerings fit within the overall legal and regulatory framework. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
It would repeal section 512(m) and effectively impose a 24-7-365 monitoring obligation on all OSPs, no matter their size or available resources. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
These are all important questions that do not necessarily have straightforward answers.Does one approach fit all loans? [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
It would repeal section 512(m) and effectively impose a 24-7-365 monitoring obligation on all OSPs, no matter their size or available resources. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
See earlier post on Lucinda Vine and Kristy Pond v PLS Financial Services, Inc. and PLS Loan Store of Texas, Inc., No. 16-50847 (5th Cir. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 12:16 pm by Ron Friedmann
On choosing a solution, think about how it fits in a lawyer’s workflow. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 12:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
Steve Tuttle, director of communications for Taser International Inc., holds the X26c stun gun in 2004 at the company’s headquarters in Scottsdale, Ariz. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
At the same time Ofcom published its “fit and proper” assessment [pdf], concluding that “the behaviours alleged at Fox News amount to significant corporate failure, however the overall evidence available to date does not provide a reasonable basis to conclude that if Sky were 100% owned and controlled by Fox, it would not be fit and proper to hold broadcast licences”. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
Iowa 2012) (holding that there is no private right of action under USDA statute). [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
Iowa 2012) (holding that there is no private right of action under USDA statute). [read post]