Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: I. S. B., Child."
Results 141 - 160
of 314
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2017, 8:10 pm
That executive order, still in draft form at the time of this writing--Moratorium on New Treaties --is the subject of this post.What follows is an annotated analysis of the Executive Order in which I seek to derive meaning from its very carefully selected words. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:53 am
Hughes’ article (which I highly recommend): Minors are considered to be wards of the court and the courts are thus charged with responsibility for their welfare in many situations. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:53 am
Hughes’ article (which I highly recommend): Minors are considered to be wards of the court and the courts are thus charged with responsibility for their welfare in many situations. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Hall (with one concurrence that did not disagree with Pryor’s analysis). [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
R.C. 2152.12(A)(1)(b) Transfer is mandatory if the child is 16 or 17, and there is probable cause to believe the child committed the act charged R.C. 2152.10(B) If a child is fourteen years of age or older at the time of the act charged and if the child is charged with an act that would be a felony if committed by an adult, the child is eligible for discretionary transfer. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:35 am
I may be contacted via the email below or via phone. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:35 am
The Family Court confirms the intention to divorce after 3 months has passed since the couple received its guidance on divorce if the parties have any child to take care of, and 1 month if not. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
But I think it’s important that people understand why this issue is an issue at all. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
“It’s déjà vu all over again. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:59 am
” The only thing I can think of is that Evans is arguing about the scope of the proposed Payday Rule, but that’s one rule. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 2:09 pm
So as a matter of judging individual welfare in ability-to-pay terms, if I give a $1M gift to my kids, this is $1M worth of consumption by me andby them. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Last week, a class action lawsuit entitled Gary B. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 11:09 am
Washing the child’s mouth out with soap was also another punishment method, and the judge did not mince his words about that : I am sorry to say it, but how any civilised adult in a modern, decent society can really argue that washing the mouth out with soap, as it has been described to me, something which may have occurred half a century or more ago, but not now, or the forcible immersion in shower is a suitable or remotely appropriate punishment, is frankly beyond… [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 1:37 pm
I must, as a matter of law and as set out above, weigh public policy concerns against the welfare of these particular children. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:16 am
A.C. 5101:2-42-18 (Children’s Services’ approval of placements with substitute caregivers) (B)(2) (For any potential caregiver or adult in the household, a search of the statewide automated child welfare information system (SACWIS) must be completed per A.C. 5101:2-33-22.) [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
Eileen Munro, writing about the Every Child Matters agenda in England, once observed: “In policy debates, there seems to be an assumption that there is some objective measure of what is in a child’s best interests and some objective standards of good parenting applicable in all social circumstances. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The appointing authority filed disciplinary charges against Doser alleging: (1) Driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law §1192(3); (2) Aggravated DWI with a blood alcohol content of .18 percent or greater in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law §1192(2-a)(a); (3) Aggravated DWI with a child in the car in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law §1192(2-a)(b); (4) Endangering the welfare of a child in violation of Penal Law… [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:45 am
Yes I've seen that front page and it's absolutely shocking!! [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
It held that the Elder Abuse Act does not require the existence of a custodial relationship in order for the plaintiff to establish a cause of action for neglect.[2] The court also rejected defendants’ contention that the trial court should determine, as a matter of law, whether defendants’ conduct constituted professional negligence rather than neglect. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm
Section 19 Equality Act provides “(1) A person (A) discriminates against another (B) if A applies to B a provision, criterion or practice which is discriminatory in relation to a relevant protected characteristic of B’s. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), a provision, criterion or practice is discriminatory in relation to a relevant protected characteristic of B’s if— (a) A applies, or would apply, it to persons with… [read post]
