Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: T. B., Child"
Results 141 - 160
of 277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
At issue in the case was an as-applied constitutional challenge to the caps on noneconomic tort damages set out in R.C. 2315.18(B). [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:59 am
The problem this demographic faces is falling real incomes and rising expenses, especially from housing, health care, education, and child care. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 2:09 pm
So as a matter of judging individual welfare in ability-to-pay terms, if I give a $1M gift to my kids, this is $1M worth of consumption by me andby them. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Last week, a class action lawsuit entitled Gary B. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 11:09 am
As a result of the inadequacy of analysis they got a second try on those arguments as the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and remitted the matter for rehearing. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 1:37 pm
I must, as a matter of law and as set out above, weigh public policy concerns against the welfare of these particular children. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:16 am
A.C. 5101:2-42-18 (Children’s Services’ approval of placements with substitute caregivers) (B)(2) (For any potential caregiver or adult in the household, a search of the statewide automated child welfare information system (SACWIS) must be completed per A.C. 5101:2-33-22.) [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
” On reflection, the whole of that excellent article ‘Confidentiality in a Preventive Child Welfare System‘ would be illuminating reading for the Scottish government, as it reflects where to go next. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The appointing authority filed disciplinary charges against Doser alleging: (1) Driving while intoxicated in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law §1192(3); (2) Aggravated DWI with a blood alcohol content of .18 percent or greater in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law §1192(2-a)(a); (3) Aggravated DWI with a child in the car in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law §1192(2-a)(b); (4) Endangering the welfare of a child in violation of Penal Law… [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
” Section 15610.57, in turn, defines “neglect” in relevant part as “[t]he negligent failure of any person having the care or custody of an elder or a dependent adult to exercise that degree of care that a reasonable person in a like position would exercise. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm
While the figures on disadvantage might not be conclusive, that didn’t matter, as the policy was clearly not designed with the ‘least intrusive measure’ in mind. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
(b).) [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:12 am
Traditional analysis: just redistribution, no welfare effects; maybe it’s in pockets of Congress, but that doesn’t matter. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm
It was said to b a compilation of the details of “29 children in 13 families who were killed…as a result of contact (and in one case residence) arrangements”. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:29 am
We have written law telling us that these matters need to be expedited. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm
Many people are under the impression that, in the event of catastrophic illness or injury, a live-in partner, or child can automatically act for them. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:25 am
The judge also classified Blankenship as a Tier II sex offender/child victim offender pursuant to R.C. 2950.01(F)(1)(b). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:00 am
B.1 (a). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:00 am
B.1 (a). [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
(b).) [read post]
