Search for: "JOHNSON v. COUNTY et al" Results 141 - 160 of 268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
MARGARITA CAMACHO, ET AL.; from Hidalgo County;13th district (13-05-00361-CV, 251 SW3d 88, 01-17-08)The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and renders judgment.Justice Phil Johnson delivered the opinion of the Court [in pdf](Justice Guzman not sitting) [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 8:23 am by Richard Hunt
California College of the Arts, et al..,2020 WL 1815741 (N.D. [read post]
Oct. 23, 2009)(per curiam) (opinion on denial of motion for rehearing) (limited discovery prior to arbitration sometimes permissible) IN RE HOUSTON PIPE LINE COMPANY, L.P., ET AL.; from Victoria County;13th district (13-07-00299-CV & 13-07-00362-CV, 269SW3d 90, 08-26-08). [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
By Wolfmann [CC BY-SA 4.0 ], from Wikimedia Commons Minarsky v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
By Wolfmann [CC BY-SA 4.0 ], from Wikimedia Commons Minarsky v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:44 am
Indiana State Dept. of Administration and/or the Div. of Disability, Aging and Rehabilative Services, Silvia Funk, et al (NFP) Michael Page v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Kiera Flynn
Jefferson County, Alabama (1996) and South Central Bell Telephone Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am by Don Cruse
WHITTINGTON, ET AL., No. 10-0316 Opinion of the Court Concurring and Dissenting This is a potentially major takings case about when government can take property for private (rather than public) benefit. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
The co-authors are Nicholas Johnson (Fordham), Michael O’Shea (Oklahoma City), George Mocsary (Connecticut), and me.Below the fold is the full Table of Contents and Preface for the book. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
Consequently, with the exception of its ruling on the fee litigation issue, the district court's decision is AFFIRMED. 07a0491p.06 2007/12/18 Beattie, et al v. [read post]
BECKY ANN JOHNSON; from Collin County; 5th district (05-05-00640-CV, 204 SW3d 897, 10-27-06 Opinion of the Dallas Court of Appeals) The Court affirms the court of appeals' judgment. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Russell Wheeler
It alleged a “vast [four state election] conspiracy;” the magistrate judge dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction O’Rourke et al v. [read post]