Search for: "JONES v. SHARP"
Results 141 - 160
of 179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm
” Hodge Jones & Allen had a post “How does GDPR Affect video surveillance(CCTV)? [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
IPSO IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 06462-21 Benwell v plymouthherald.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 9 Reporting of a crime (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 03211-21 Brown v The Courier, 1 Accuracy (2021) Breach – sanction: publication of correction 01887-21 Rahnama v The Mail on Sunday, 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation New Issued Cases There were 10 new… [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm
Jones did not. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 4:39 pm
Massachusetts in 1944 to Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Jones will hold an evidentiary hearing to evaluate Meadows’ filing. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am
On 2 May 2018, Sir Geoffrey Vos heard an application in the case of Appleby v BBC. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 7:52 am
Circuit in Heller v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm
Robert V. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 638 (Tex. 1999). [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
Dame Victoria Sharp and Mr Justice Johnson dismissed most of Assange’s legal arguments but said that unless “satisfactory” assurances were given by the US, he would be able to bring an appeal on three grounds. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am
As mentioned above, on Wednesday 11 December 2024, the Court of Appeal (Sharp P, Nicola Davies and Dingemans LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Prismall v Google [2024] EWCA Civ 1516. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 04123-19 Philips v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 03262-19 Bromley v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Resolved- IPSO mediation 08073-18 A woman v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 11 Victims of sexual assault (2018), No breach- after investigation 03816-19 Hayden… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
In the light of this ruling (and one to much the same effect by Sharp J in Ecclestone v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
Corp., 137 So. 2d 563, 564 (Fla. 1962) (sharp piece on playground equipment amputated three-year-old‘s finger); McCabe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The “tidal wave” of defamation cases on the internet[3] is matched by “tidal waves” in other areas of electronic communication e.g. child pornography (R v Sharpe [2001] 1 SCR 45 at [166]; see also “Sentencing Offenders convicted of child pornography and child abuse material offences”, JCR Monograph 34, September 2010, p. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
